Skip to main content

Security report for nfon.com

NFON AG · Technology · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NFON AG is a large German technology company specializing in cloud-based telephony solutions, particularly cloud PBX systems for businesses across Europe. The company targets business customers seeking scalable and flexible telephony services delivered via the cloud. Their market position is strong as a leading European cloud PBX provider, offering unified communications and telephony solutions. Technically, the website infrastructure is minimal with a geoip2-based country redirect script and hosted on myracloud. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support and poor security posture. Email security is well configured with valid SPF and DMARC records, and DNS records indicate professional email handling via Mimecast. The website content is minimal, lacking metadata, structured data, or visible business contact information, which negatively impacts user experience and trust. Security headers are partially implemented but critical TLS protocols and cipher suites are missing, exposing the site to risks. Overall, the site has a low security score and poor privacy compliance, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Strategic improvements are needed to install valid SSL, enhance security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and improve website content and professionalism.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nfon.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfon.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nfon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
838
Employees
11
Customers
760
Third parties
67
Weak passwords
25%

Latest record dated 2025-11-14 · 25 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nfon.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –portal.nfon.com2025-11-14
  • –portal.nfon.com2025-09-20
  • –start.nfon.com2025-09-19
  • –start.nfon.com2025-07-31
  • –neorecording.nfon.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NFON AG operates in the cloud telephony sector with a B2B SaaS business model. Their competitive advantage lies in providing cloud PBX solutions that enable businesses to manage telephony flexibly. The company likely generates revenue through subscription services for telephony solutions. The target customers are businesses across Europe requiring unified communications. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding date and business claims, supporting legitimacy. The company uses professional email security services and DNS infrastructure. However, the website lacks marketing and analytics tools, and no social media presence was detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and security policies and contact details online may hinder customer trust and compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability. Although SPF and DMARC records are correctly configured, the lack of TLS protocols and strong cipher suites exposes the site to interception risks. Security headers are partially present but incomplete. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. The site does not implement OCSP stapling or session resumption, impacting both security and performance. These gaps indicate a low maturity level in security practices, posing risks to data confidentiality and user trust. Immediate remediation of SSL and TLS issues is essential, alongside publishing security policies and improving incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Implement security.txt and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a minimal JavaScript-based geoip2 country redirect mechanism and is hosted on myracloud infrastructure. DNS records are professionally managed with multiple authoritative nameservers and email security via Mimecast. However, the lack of valid SSL certificate and TLS support severely limits secure communications. No CMS or frameworks were detected, indicating a possibly static or custom-built site. Performance data is missing, but the minimal content suggests slow or incomplete loading metrics. SEO and accessibility features are absent or minimal due to lack of metadata and structured data. The technical debt includes outdated or missing security configurations and lack of modern web standards implementation, which could impact business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.