Skip to main content

Security report for nextanalytica.io

Next analytica · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Next analytica is a Czech Republic-based technology company specializing in server-side tracking solutions and marketing analytics. They develop proprietary products for server analytics, Looker Studio reporting, margin imports, and web analytics consulting. Their market position is that of a niche provider offering advanced data measurement and optimization services to marketing professionals, e-commerce platforms, and agencies. The website demonstrates a strong digital maturity with modern cloud infrastructure leveraging AWS and Microsoft Azure, and a professional Webflow-based front end optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and public security policies. Overall, the company presents a trustworthy and professional image with clear service offerings, client references, and transparent pricing. The absence of WHOIS data is due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. The website is free from adult or questionable content and complies with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nextanalytica.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nextanalytica.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Next analytica operates a B2B SaaS and consulting business model focused on enhancing marketing campaign performance through server-side tracking technology. Their competitive advantage lies in full-service expertise from development to analytics, rapid integration capabilities, and support for multiple advertising platforms including Meta and Google Ads. Revenue streams include monthly subscription plans with tiered pricing and optional margin import add-ons. The company targets medium-sized businesses and agencies seeking to improve data accuracy and campaign efficiency. Their partnership ecosystem includes cloud providers like AWS and Microsoft Azure. Strategic observations highlight their focus on innovation in data measurement and strong customer support as key growth drivers.

Security posture

The website and associated services exhibit a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with granular controls, and server-side data processing enhancing data control and privacy. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, and security headers are not visibly implemented. There is no security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of reputable cloud providers reduce risk. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, implementing security headers, and establishing formal vulnerability disclosure channels to strengthen trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance public documentation on monitoring, autoscaling, and data protection practices to build customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Next analytica
Description
Řešení pro serverové měření od Next analytica, která se zabývá vývojem vlastního produktu pro serverovou analytiku, Looker Studio reportingem, importem marží a konzultací webové analytiky.
Key services
Server Side Tracking, Looker Studio reporting, Import marží do reklamních systémů, Consulting in web analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager Server Side, AWS (Amazon Web Services), Microsoft Azure, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Inter), jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of server-side tracking to improve data control

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager Server Side
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Ads (Facebook Ads)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Server Google Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multi-language support.
  3. Strong focus on server-side tracking technology and marketing analytics.
  4. Clear cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls.
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact via forms.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and cloud hosting providers.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  9. Pricing plans clearly detailed with transparent service offerings.
  10. No visible security.txt or explicit security policy documents.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager Server Side, AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Fonts. It uses jQuery 3.5.1 and custom JavaScript for enhanced functionality. Hosting is likely provided by Webflow with backend services on cloud platforms. The site is fast loading, mobile optimized, and accessible with good SEO practices. Integration with multiple marketing and analytics tools is evident. Technical risks are minimal but could be further reduced by implementing security headers and formalizing security policies. The infrastructure supports autoscaling and 24/7 monitoring, indicating robust operational capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nextanalytica.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nextanalytica.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.