Skip to main content

Security report for nextanalytica.io

Next analytica · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Next analytica is a Czech-based technology company specializing in server-side tracking solutions designed to enhance marketing campaign performance by increasing data accuracy and speed. Their offerings include proprietary server-side analytics products, Looker Studio reporting, margin import tools, and web analytics consulting. The company targets marketing professionals, e-commerce platforms, and agencies, positioning itself as a trusted provider with a strong regional presence and a medium-sized team of experts. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern cloud infrastructure primarily hosted on Microsoft Azure and AWS, with integrations to Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and other marketing tools. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, provides cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and uses server-side tracking to improve data control. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nextanalytica.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Next analytica operates in the technology sector, focusing on marketing analytics and server-side tracking solutions. Their business model combines SaaS offerings with consulting services, targeting B2B clients such as agencies and e-commerce businesses. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through rapid integration capabilities, full-service support, and advanced data enrichment features like margin imports. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with major cloud providers and a clear focus on GDPR compliance. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for server-side tracking plans and consulting engagements. The company maintains an active social media presence and showcases client logos to build trust. Growth indicators include Microsoft for Startups grant recognition and a comprehensive service portfolio. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding integrations and enhancing data-driven marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. Server-side tracking enhances data security by reducing client-side exposure. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable cloud hosting providers with 24/7 monitoring and autoscaling capabilities, indicating operational security awareness. To improve, the company should publish a security policy, implement security.txt for vulnerability disclosure, and enhance accessibility compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from increased transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to provide a standardized channel for security researchers to report vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities or outdated libraries.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards, improving usability for all users and meeting legal requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Next analytica
Description
Řešení pro serverové měření od Next analytica, která se zabývá vývojem vlastního produktu pro serverovou analytiku, Looker Studio reportingem, importem marží a konzultací webové analytiky.
Key services
Server Side Tracking, Looker Studio reporting, Import marží do reklamních systémů, Consulting in web analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, AWS, Microsoft Azure, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of server-side tracking to improve data control

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Looker Studio
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting Czech and regional markets.
  3. Strong focus on server-side tracking technology and marketing analytics.
  4. Clear cookie consent and privacy policy implementation.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page; contact via form.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on reputable cloud providers.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contacts published.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting is primarily on Microsoft Azure with AWS also mentioned, ensuring high availability and scalability. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized, with good SEO metadata and structured content. The use of server-side tracking indicates advanced technical maturity in data collection and privacy management. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and some accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting the business goals effectively while maintaining good performance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nextanalytica.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nextanalytica.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.