Skip to main content

Security report for nexigen.digital

Nexigen Digital Pty Ltd · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nexigen Digital Pty Ltd is a medium-sized Australian technology company specializing in providing online solutions and digital innovation services to Australian businesses. Founded in 2008, the company hosts over 250,000 websites and supports more than 300,000 customers with a 100% Australian-based team. Their market position is strong within the Australian digital services sector, offering web hosting and technology-led business growth tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and served via LiteSpeed servers with caching enabled, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking but does not have a cookie consent mechanism, indicating partial privacy compliance. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly lowers the security posture. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, but the lack of SSL and privacy compliance mechanisms present risks that should be addressed promptly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nexigen.digital

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nexigen.digital, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nexigen.digital.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nexigen Digital operates as a technology service provider focused on the Australian market, targeting businesses seeking to grow their online presence. Their business model revolves around hosting, digital solutions, and local support, leveraging a portfolio of brands including VentraIP, Synergy Wholesale, and Digital Eagles. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem and a large customer base, positioning itself as a leader in the Australian digital services industry. Revenue streams likely include hosting fees, digital service subscriptions, and support contracts. The company emphasizes Australian-based support and award-winning services as competitive advantages. Growth indicators include a large number of hosted websites and customers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and market position.

Security posture

The current security posture of Nexigen Digital's website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement. While some security headers like Content Security Policy and HSTS are present, they are not fully configured to maximize protection. The site does not support modern TLS protocols, lacks OCSP stapling, and does not implement session resumption, which impacts both security and performance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, and no security certifications are indicated. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and incomplete privacy compliance further highlight gaps in data protection practices. These issues expose the company to risks such as data interception, user trust erosion, and potential regulatory non-compliance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and privacy controls is recommended to improve the security maturity level.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement full HSTS policy including includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency.
  6. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for trust and compliance.
  7. Regularly audit and update security headers and SSL configurations to maintain best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 and served via LiteSpeed web server with LiteSpeed Cache plugin enabled, indicating a modern and performant infrastructure. The DNS setup uses VentraIP name servers and Google MX records for email. The site loads jQuery 3.7.1 and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks. Performance metrics are unavailable, but caching and CDN usage suggest moderate to good performance potential. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades to ensure safe and trusted operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nexigen.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nexigen.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.