Skip to main content

Security report for nex.ee

Nex OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nex OÜ operates as a small Estonian IT service provider specializing in computer repair, network consulting, remote support, and IT infrastructure management. The company positions itself as a reliable local partner with authorized partnerships from recognized brands such as Lenovo and Epson. Their website clearly communicates their service offerings and contact information, targeting businesses and individuals requiring IT support and hardware sales. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and utilizes modern web technologies including jQuery, LiteSpeed Cache, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. However, some security best practices such as security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security headers to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nex.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nex OÜ operates in the technology sector as an IT service provider focusing on local Estonian markets. Their business model combines service delivery (repair, maintenance, consulting) with hardware sales. The company leverages partnerships with major IT brands to enhance credibility. Target customers include small to medium businesses and individual consumers needing IT support. The website content and structure indicate a stable, small-sized company with a clear market niche. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company maintains a social media presence on Facebook, supporting customer engagement and marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is basic to moderate, suitable for a small IT service provider but with room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices and website compliance to maintain trust and reduce risk.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nex OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nex OÜ
Description
Nex is a reliable IT partner offering computers, maintenance and repair, networks, servers, firewalls, and camera systems.
Key services
Remote support, Computer repair and maintenance, On-site technician visits, Network consultation and construction, IT infrastructure management, Firewall installation and configuration, Camera system installation, IT hardware sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, LiteSpeed Cache, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone number and physical address.
  4. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks some security headers.
  5. Business appears to be a small local IT service provider in Estonia with authorized partnerships.
  6. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are used for typography and analytics, respectively. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, no advanced frameworks or platforms were detected. The absence of some security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory areas. The website could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and further performance tuning to improve user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nex.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nex.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.