Skip to main content

Security report for network-box.com

Network Box Corporation Ltd. · Technology · Hong Kong

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Network Box Corporation Ltd. operates a professional website offering managed cybersecurity services globally, targeting businesses of all sizes. Their core offerings include 24x7x365 managed security services, penetration testing, dark web monitoring, and zero trust endpoint security. The company positions itself as a cost-effective, enterprise-grade MSSP with a strong focus on real-time protection and comprehensive cyber defense. Technically, the website is built on Squarespace with standard web technologies and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. However, the site lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in an insecure HTTP connection, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are partially implemented but could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie banner and privacy policy present, but no explicit GDPR compliance indicators or terms of service are found. The site includes multiple contact forms with CAPTCHA protection and active social media channels, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to enable HTTPS and strengthen its security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching network-box.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention network-box.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
72
Employees
0
Customers
72
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
26%

11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for network-box.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Network Box is positioned as a specialized MSSP serving a global clientele with a broad portfolio of cybersecurity services and hardware solutions tailored for small to enterprise-level organizations. Their business model emphasizes managed services with continuous monitoring and protection, differentiating from self-managed or product-only providers. The company maintains partnerships and certifications that enhance trust and market positioning. Their content strategy includes newsletters, security articles, and detailed service descriptions, targeting IT decision-makers and security-conscious businesses. The presence of multiple regional offices and resellers indicates a medium-sized enterprise with growth potential. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage prospects and clients effectively.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate, exposing users to potential interception and data compromise. While some security headers like HSTS (though not fully enabled), X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options are present, the lack of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability. No advanced security policies or incident response contacts are publicly disclosed. Forms are protected with CAPTCHA, reducing spam risk. DNS configuration lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could enhance domain security. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, indicating limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation to secure communications and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Acquire and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable full HSTS policy with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish clear terms of service and security policy documents to enhance transparency and compliance.
  5. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted on Squarespace infrastructure, with DNS records managed under network-box.com. Performance metrics are not available, but the site includes multiple high-resolution images and video backgrounds which may impact load times. Mobile optimization and accessibility appear good based on responsive design and semantic HTML usage. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, the lack of HTTPS is a significant technical deficiency that undermines overall site security and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with network-box.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review network-box.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.