Skip to main content

Security report for netuse.de

NetUSE AG · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetUSE AG is a well-established German IT service provider specializing in infrastructure, network, and IT security solutions since 1992. The company offers a broad range of services including managed services, advanced security, consulting, assessments, support, and cloud/datacenter solutions. Their market position is strong with over 30 years of experience, a loyal customer base, and a focus on personalized service. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand with consistent messaging and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern optimizations such as CSS and JS minification, cookie consent management via Borlabs Cookie, and privacy-respecting analytics through Matomo. Hosting is supported by Akamai CDN infrastructure, ensuring good performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with proper SEO metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and manages cookie consent effectively. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and there is no publicly available security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were found, indicating a solid security posture but with room for improvement in transparency and header hardening. Overall, the risk profile is low with a high trustworthiness rating. The company demonstrates compliance with GDPR and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to further enhance trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netuse.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention netuse.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for netuse.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetUSE AG operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT infrastructure and security services. Their business model centers on providing tailored managed services, consulting, and security assessments to enterprise and medium-sized business clients. The company benefits from a stable ownership structure with founders still active, organic growth, and a strong reputation in the German market. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized technology vendors and a dedicated career and support portal, indicating a mature operational setup. Revenue streams likely derive from long-term managed service contracts, consulting projects, and support agreements. The company targets organizations requiring robust IT security and infrastructure management, positioning itself as a trusted partner with over three decades of experience.

Security posture

NetUSE AG exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent management aligned with GDPR. The use of Matomo analytics reflects a privacy-conscious approach. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting external reporting channels. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security commitments, controls, and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing clear contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain compliance with evolving GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NetUSE AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetUSE AG
Description
NetUSE AG ist seit 1992 Partner für Infrastruktur, Netzwerk und IT-Sicherheit. Sie bieten Projekte und kompletten Betrieb inklusive Lifecycle-Management an.
Key services
Managed Services, Advanced Security Services, Consulting, Assessment Services, Support Services, Cloud und Datacenter
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Borlabs Cookie Consent, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare Turnstile (cookie consent related), PHP, CSS Autoptimize
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management with Borlabs Cookie
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear focus on IT infrastructure and security services.
  3. Strong emphasis on customer trust and long-term relationships.
  4. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policy with consent management.
  5. Use of privacy-friendly analytics (Matomo).
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response page.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and optimized CSS/JS assets via Autoptimize. Hosting leverages Akamai CDN infrastructure, enhancing performance and availability. The site uses Borlabs Cookie for consent management and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for form protection. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and asset delivery. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid, supporting a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netuse.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netuse.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.