Skip to main content

Security report for netsecurity.no

Netsecurity · Technology · Norway

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netsecurity is a Norwegian digital security company focused on enhancing safety for private companies and public sector organizations in an increasingly digital world. The company is approved by the Norwegian National Security Authority (NSM), indicating a strong market position in critical infrastructure protection. Their services target sectors such as energy, transportation, and telecommunications, emphasizing the security of complex, interconnected digital systems. The website content is professional and well-structured, with multimedia elements like videos to educate visitors on digital vulnerabilities. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and implements standard security headers and HTTPS, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with privacy regulations, though the absence of a dedicated privacy policy and terms of service pages indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong trust indicators, though enhancing privacy disclosures and contact transparency would further strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netsecurity.no

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netsecurity operates in the digital security sector with a focus on critical infrastructure protection in Norway. Their approval by NSM provides a competitive advantage and credibility in the market. The business model revolves around providing security consulting and protection services to both private and public entities. The target customers are organizations requiring high assurance in digital safety, particularly in sectors like energy and transportation. The company leverages HubSpot for marketing and analytics, indicating a modern approach to customer engagement. Growth potential is supported by increasing digitalization and the need for robust security solutions. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with a cookie consent mechanism, supporting privacy compliance. However, the lack of a published privacy policy and terms of service reduces transparency and may present compliance gaps under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or incident response email address.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netsecurity
Description
Netsecurity hjelper private selskaper og offentlige virksomheter med økt trygghet i en digital verden. Vi er godkjent av Nasjonal Sikkerhetsmyndighet (NSM)
Key services
digital security consulting, infrastructure protection, critical infrastructure security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Font Awesome, Blaze Slider
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies and consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads (hsadspixel.net)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Norwegian with English alternate links
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  6. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools
  7. Strong focus on digital security and critical infrastructure
  8. Video content included to explain vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Blaze Slider for interactive elements. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses HTTPS with strong security headers, contributing to a secure browsing experience. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Some CSS and accessibility enhancements could be made to improve user experience and compliance. The absence of server-side technical details limits deeper infrastructure analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netsecurity.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netsecurity.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.