Skip to main content

Security report for netreviews.com

Avis vérifiés · Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avis Vérifiés is a French SaaS platform specializing in the collection, moderation, and publication of authentic customer reviews to enhance e-reputation and boost sales conversions. Positioned as a market leader in France, it offers a comprehensive suite of services including review collection, management, activation, analysis, and syndication, enriched with AI capabilities. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, leveraging WordPress CMS and modern marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Wistia for video content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain transparency, although the website content and branding strongly indicate a legitimate business operation. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found in the provided content, suggesting room for improvement in compliance and user trust. Overall, the platform demonstrates a solid technical infrastructure and business credibility but should enhance privacy disclosures and domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netreviews.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention netreviews.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for netreviews.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets e-commerce businesses and brands seeking to leverage customer reviews for improved trust and conversion rates. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, offering tools for review lifecycle management and analytics. The presence of multiple language versions indicates a strategy for international reach, while partnerships with entities like Skeepers suggest a broader ecosystem integration. The website showcases reputable client logos and uses trust badges, reinforcing market positioning. Growth potential is supported by AI integration and SEO benefits from authentic user-generated content. However, the lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses asynchronous loading of tracking and analytics scripts to minimize performance impact. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, indicating an opportunity for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests a moderate security maturity level. The use of third-party services like Sentry for error tracking is a positive indicator. To improve, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security policies, and establish clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enhance domain registration transparency by updating WHOIS information or using verified registrars to improve trustworthiness.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen website security.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Add visible and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avis vérifiés
Description
Avis Vérifiés est la solution française leader pour collecter, modérer et publier des avis clients authentiques post‑achat. Améliorez votre e‑réputation, boostez la confiance et augmentez vos conversions.
Key services
Collecte des avis, Gestion des avis, Activation des avis, Analyse des avis, Syndication des avis, Diversité des avis, IA & avis clients
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Wistia video player, Axeptio (cookie consent), Sentry (error tracking)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Sentry error tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Wistia video player, Axeptio cookie consent, HubSpot Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, business-focused on customer review solutions.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Strong use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for optimization.
  8. Multiple language versions available via hreflang links.
  9. Good mobile optimization and responsive design observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring good SEO practices. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, and Wistia for video content. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is mature and well-integrated, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netreviews.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netreviews.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.