Skip to main content

Security report for netlife.com

Netlife Design · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netlife Design is a Norwegian design and technology agency specializing in creating digital services and products grounded in insight and analysis. The company positions itself as a leading player in the Norwegian market, offering services including design, content creation, technology development, strategy, and innovation. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with strong branding and clear communication targeted at businesses seeking digital transformation and user-centric solutions. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, asynchronous loading, and advanced analytics tools such as Piwik PRO and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, enhancing user experience and accessibility. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and follows best practices like avoiding exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and structured data strongly suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in security posture and business credibility transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netlife.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netlife Design operates in the technology sector as a medium-sized agency focused on digital design and technology services. Their business model revolves around providing consultancy and development services to other businesses, emphasizing user experience, innovation, and data-driven strategies. The company maintains a strong online presence with active social media channels and client references, supporting their market position as a trusted design and technology partner in Norway. Revenue streams likely include project-based consulting, training, and digital product development. The company targets businesses requiring digital transformation and user-centric digital solutions. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The firm demonstrates consistent branding and high-quality content, reinforcing its professional image and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of modern script loading techniques and analytics tools is evident. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are important for compliance and trust. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header policies and publish security-related documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure WHOIS data availability and legitimacy.
  5. Continue maintaining privacy compliance with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Netlife Design
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netlife Design
Description
Netlife er et ledende design- og teknologibyrå som gjennom innsikt og analyse, utvikler digitale tjenester og produkter som funker for folk.
Key services
Design, Content creation, Technology development, Strategy and innovation, Insight and analysis
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Piwik PRO analytics, Google Tag Manager, Imgix image CDN
Frameworks
Vite (build tool)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async and defer in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, Cookie Script
Marketing tools
Cookie Script, Piwik PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Clear contact information and social media presence
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with Vite as the build tool, asynchronous script loading, and integration with Piwik PRO and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Images are served via Imgix CDN, optimizing performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA landmarks. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is fast with good SEO and metadata implementation. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential domain registration issues due to absent WHOIS data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netlife.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netlife.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.