Skip to main content

Security report for netland.fi

Netland Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netland Oy is a Finnish software company specializing in the development of websites and web applications, offering tailored internet, intranet, extranet, and mobile solutions. Established since 1991, the company maintains a professional online presence with a focus on business clients requiring customized software solutions. Their key offerings include proprietary publishing systems (SiteRunner and AppRunner), custom web applications, server solutions, and email services. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and clear service descriptions. Technically, the website employs a range of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, SweetAlert, and Howler.js, indicating a moderately modern tech stack. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and structured navigation. However, no major modern frameworks or CMS platforms beyond their proprietary SiteRunner system are detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and DNSSEC, which are positive indicators. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these elements suggests room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR through clear privacy and cookie policies. The domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and maintaining up-to-date libraries to improve the security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netland.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netland Oy operates in the Finnish technology sector, focusing on software development for web and mobile platforms. Their market positioning is that of a specialized, small-sized software house with a long-standing presence since 1991. The business model centers on custom software solutions and proprietary publishing systems, targeting organizations needing tailored digital services. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, custom development projects, and hosting/email services. The company showcases client references, indicating a stable customer base and professional reputation. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting independent operation. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of common web technologies and embedded Facebook content suggests some integration with mainstream platforms.

Security posture

The current security posture of Netland Oy's website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and DNSSEC provides a solid foundation for secure communications and domain integrity. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but further transparency on data protection officer contact or security frameworks would enhance trust. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with clear opportunities for strengthening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to avoid known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration and verify with external tools such as SSL Labs to ensure strong encryption standards.
  5. Increase transparency by providing contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to improve trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Netland Oy
Registration number
1054728-8
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netland Oy
Description
Olemme verkkosivustojen ja -sovellusten toteuttamiseen erikoistunut ohjelmistotalo. Tarjoamme Internet-sivustoihin liittyvien palveluiden lisäksi intranet-, extranet- ja mobiiliratkaisuja asiakkaan mittojen mukaan.
Key services
Websites, Web applications, SiteRunner publishing system, AppRunner publishing system, Custom web applications, Server solutions, Email services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, SweetAlert, Howler.js, Pickadate.js, jQuery UI, SmartMenus
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No signs of WAF or security blocking.
  3. Professional business website for a Finnish software company.
  4. Clear contact information and cookie consent mechanism present.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond GDPR privacy and cookie policies.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic UI libraries.
  8. No social media links explicitly found except Facebook embedded content references.
  9. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform called SiteRunner, supplemented by various JavaScript libraries including jQuery, SweetAlert, Howler.js, and Pickadate.js. The site uses responsive design techniques with multiple CSS stylesheets targeting different screen sizes, indicating good mobile optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are present, enhancing usability. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced caching or CDN usage. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation menus. The technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities exist by adopting more current frameworks or improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netland.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netland.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.