NETHINKS GmbH · Technology · Germany
High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.
NETHINKS GmbH is a German-based IT and telecommunications service provider established in 2004, specializing in intelligent network solutions, VoIP, and web/mail hosting services. The company positions itself as a competent partner for businesses requiring tailored IT infrastructure and communication solutions, emphasizing innovation, customer service, and neutrality in technology recommendations. Their market presence is supported by a medium-sized, owner-managed business model with a strong regional focus in Fulda, Germany. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform with common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the business claims, with no blocking or WAF interference detected. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie consent mechanisms, and indicates ISO 27001 certification, enhancing trustworthiness. However, there is room for improvement in DNSSEC deployment and security headers implementation. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies in German, aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, NETHINKS GmbH presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with solid business credibility and technical maturity. The security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices. The risk level is low, and the company demonstrates a strong commitment to privacy and data protection.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DKIM selector 'default' uses 648-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention nethinks.com, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nethinks.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with nethinks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nethinks.com.