Skip to main content

Security report for netent.com

NetEnt AB (publ) · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetEnt AB (publ) is a leading technology provider specializing in digitally distributed gaming systems for the online gaming industry. With over 20 years of experience, the company offers a comprehensive suite of gaming solutions including games, pooled jackpots, branded games, and back-office services. Their target audience primarily consists of online gaming operators seeking premium gaming content and services. NetEnt holds multiple licenses from reputable regulatory bodies such as the UK Gambling Commission and Malta Gaming Authority, underscoring their commitment to compliance and responsible gaming. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Modernizr, and Owl Carousel. It demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. The site employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing insights. A cookie consent mechanism is present, supporting privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices such as HTTPS enforcement, use of reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent banners. However, it lacks explicit security policy documentation and incident response contact details, which are recommended for enhanced transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, NetEnt's website reflects a mature, professional, and trustworthy online presence aligned with its market position as a premium gaming technology supplier. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to registrar query limitations rather than suspicious activity. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, providing incident response contacts, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netent.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetEnt operates as a B2B technology provider in the online gaming sector, supplying gaming content and services to some of the world's most successful operators. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive portfolio of games, regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions, and a strong brand recognized for quality and innovation. Revenue streams likely include licensing fees, service contracts, and revenue sharing from gaming operators. The company targets regulated markets and partners with major industry players, including its parent company Evolution. Growth indicators include multi-awarded recognition and continuous service expansion. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with links to beta platforms and affiliated sites. Operationally, NetEnt maintains a strong focus on responsible gaming and regulatory adherence, which supports sustainable market presence.

Security posture

NetEnt demonstrates a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, and cookie consent mechanisms supporting privacy compliance. The presence of multiple gambling licenses indicates adherence to stringent regulatory security requirements. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, and third-party scripts appear standard for analytics and marketing. The security culture is implied through responsible gaming commitments and privacy policies but could be enhanced by explicit security disclosures and vulnerability reporting channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NetEnt AB (publ)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetEnt AB (publ)
Description
NetEnt is a premium supplier of digitally distributed gaming systems used by some of the world's most successful online gaming operators.
Key services
Gaming Solutions (Games, Pooled Jackpots, Branded Games, Back Office™)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Modernizr, Owl Carousel, LazyLoad, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, WordPress CMS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong focus on responsible gaming and regulatory compliance.
  3. Multiple gambling licenses and certifications displayed.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Modernizr, alongside UI components like Owl Carousel and LazyLoad for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Analytics integration includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, enabling moderate user tracking. The technical infrastructure appears robust with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium23 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.