Skip to main content

Security report for netconomy.net

NETCONOMY GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NETCONOMY GmbH is a mature technology consulting and digital platform services company founded in 2000 and based in Austria. The company specializes in digital transformation, cloud adoption, AI-powered solutions, and customer experience platforms, serving a global clientele with a strong partner ecosystem including SAP, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with clear service offerings and customer references. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics integrations but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security gap. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and privacy policies. The overall security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and TLS support, exposing the site to risks. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment and security policy transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of netconomy.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netconomy.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NETCONOMY positions itself as a key player in digital transformation consulting with a focus on scalable digital platforms and AI solutions. Their business model leverages partnerships with hyperscale cloud providers and SAP to deliver integrated solutions. The company targets medium to large enterprises seeking to innovate and optimize customer experiences. Their long domain age and consistent WHOIS data support a stable market presence. The website content and references indicate a strong reputation and trusted client relationships. Marketing efforts include active use of HubSpot and social media channels to engage prospects and customers.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently poor due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are fundamental for secure communications. While some security headers like HSTS and X-Content-Type-Options are present, they are insufficient without HTTPS. No formal security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of Cloudflare CDN provides some protection, but the lack of encryption is a critical vulnerability. Privacy compliance is well implemented with cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy, mitigating some regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure secure cipher suites.
  3. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  6. Improve accessibility features and mobile optimization to enhance user experience.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to stay compliant with evolving regulations.
  8. Consider performance optimization to improve load times and user engagement.
  9. Leverage security monitoring tools to detect and respond to threats proactively.
  10. Strengthen trust signals by adding certifications or compliance badges if applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NETCONOMY GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and GDPR Cookie Compliance plugins, integrating marketing tools like HubSpot and Facebook Pixel. It uses Cloudflare as a CDN and DNS provider. The site has a modern, responsive design with multilingual support. However, the lack of SSL/TLS severely impacts security and user trust. Performance data is unavailable, but the site uses preloading and asynchronous script loading for optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is standard for a professional consulting firm but requires urgent security upgrades to meet industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 48/100High26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netconomy.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netconomy.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.