Skip to main content

Security report for netbox.fi

Netbox Finland Oy · Technology · Finland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netbox Finland Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in electronic invoicing, banking connection services, EDI, and company data solutions. The company positions itself as a customer-centric digital services provider offering comprehensive integration and data management services through a single interface. Their market focus includes both private and public sector organizations seeking efficient digital transaction and data solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and customer testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Libre Form plugin for contact forms, and tracking scripts such as Leadfeeder and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain and its alignment with the business entity. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good security and privacy practices. Strategically, the company should consider publishing explicit security policies and incident response information, implementing security.txt for vulnerability disclosures, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen their security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netbox.fi

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netbox Finland Oy operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on digital integration services such as e-invoicing, banking connections, EDI, and company data services. Their business model revolves around providing seamless digital transaction and data management solutions to businesses, emphasizing ease of adoption and integration through a unified interface. The company targets a broad customer base including private enterprises and public organizations. Their market positioning highlights customer orientation and technological expertise, supported by partnerships and a strong service portfolio. The presence of customer testimonials and detailed service descriptions indicates a focus on trust-building and long-term client relationships. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, ensuring encrypted communications and user privacy compliance. No security policy or incident response pages were found, indicating a potential gap in transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Tracking scripts are used responsibly with consent mechanisms. The absence of security headers such as CSP or HSTS suggests room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Netbox Finland Oy
Registration number
2604470-6
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netbox Finland Oy
Description
Netbox Finland Oy offers electronic invoicing, banking connection, EDI, and company data services. They focus on easy adoption of these services through a single interface, specializing in system integrations and message transmission and conversion.
Key services
Verkkolaskupalvelut (E-invoicing services), Pankkiyhteyspalvelut (Bank connection services), EDI-palvelut (EDI services), Datapalvelut (Data services)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts (EB Garamond, Tajawal), Libre Form plugin, Vine.eu scripts, Leadfeeder tracking
Frameworks
WordPress theme: netbox
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • Anonymized Google Analytics setup
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive contact information including form, email, phone, and physical address.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent banner.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. Presence of tracking scripts with consent mechanism.
  7. Professional and consistent branding and content quality.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a custom theme named 'netbox'. It utilizes modern web fonts from Google Fonts and includes JavaScript libraries for form handling (Libre Form), tracking (Leadfeeder, Google Tag Manager), and lazy loading images. The site is responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with preloading of CSS assets and asynchronous loading of scripts. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence with opportunities to improve security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netbox.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netbox.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.