Skip to main content

Security report for nedbase.nl

Nedbase · Technology · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nedbase is a medium-sized full-service digital agency based in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands. The company specializes in websites, e-commerce platforms, applications, social intranet solutions, and online marketing services. With a team of approximately 50 professionals, Nedbase positions itself as a regional expert enabling businesses to realize their digital ambitions. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear branding and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a robust tech stack including Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, and Leadinfo. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with excellent accessibility features and performance rated as moderate. The use of structured data and SEO plugins like Yoast further enhances its digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with granular user controls, demonstrating GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the site lacks explicit security policy and incident response pages, which could be improved to enhance trust and transparency. Overall, Nedbase presents a trustworthy and professional digital agency with a strong compliance posture and modern technical infrastructure. Strategic recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies, enhancing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security integrity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nedbase.nl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
93
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nedbase operates in the competitive digital agency market in the Netherlands, focusing on the Zeeland region. Its business model revolves around providing end-to-end digital solutions including web development, e-commerce, and online marketing. The company leverages a team of 50 professionals, indicating a medium-sized operation with capacity for diverse client projects. The presence of multiple social media channels and positive Google Maps ratings suggests active engagement and a solid reputation. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to client services. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company’s market positioning as a full-service agency with local expertise is a competitive advantage in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Cookie consent is managed with a compliant mechanism allowing users to control preferences, statistics, and marketing cookies. The use of reCAPTCHA on forms adds protection against automated abuse. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and readiness by publishing formal security documentation and response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing clear information on data protection officer and compliance measures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nedbase
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nedbase
Description
Nedbase is een Full-service Digital Agency in Middelburg (Zeeland) en expert in Websites, E-commerce, Applicaties, Social Intranet en Online Marketing.
Key services
Websites, E-commerce, Applicaties, Social Intranet, Online Marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Futy Widget, Leadinfo
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Leadinfo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Leadinfo, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Leadinfo, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with detailed cookie consent and privacy policy
  3. Professional digital agency with clear business focus and services
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with transparent disclosures
  5. No critical security issues detected; good security posture
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  7. Contact information is clearly presented and verified
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-maintained technology stack including Gravity Forms for form management, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and multiple analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Leadinfo. SEO is optimized using Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple third-party scripts and tracking tools. Hosting provider details were not explicitly identified. The site uses cookie consent management via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for continuous monitoring of third-party scripts and potential performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nedbase.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nedbase.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.