Skip to main content

Security report for nea.moe

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nea.moe is a personal portfolio and blog site for Linnea Gräf, a software developer specializing in JVM languages such as Kotlin and Java. The site highlights personal coding projects, including maintenance of the NotEnoughUpdates project, and provides contact information primarily via email and social media. The domain is privacy protected and registered through a US-based privacy service, consistent with the personal nature of the site. The technical infrastructure uses the Astro framework, delivering a modern, fast, and mobile-optimized experience with minimal tracking via Plausible Analytics. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though the site lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional for a personal portfolio but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nea.moe

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

nea.moe operates as a personal branding and portfolio platform for an individual developer rather than a commercial business entity. The market positioning is niche, targeting fellow developers, open-source contributors, and followers of Linnea's work. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal projects and community contributions. The site leverages GitHub and social media for outreach and engagement. Growth indicators include active maintenance of open-source projects and a modest but consistent online presence. There are no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The site’s simplicity and focused content reflect a small-scale operation with a clear personal branding strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency for security issues. The minimal use of tracking scripts and lack of exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding incident response contact information and formalizing security policies to build trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
Personal website of Linnea Gräf showcasing coding projects, personal interests, and contact information.
Key services
Personal coding projects, Maintainer of NotEnoughUpdates, Blog and tools sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro, JavaScript
Frameworks
Astro v4.15.1
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
pla.nea.moe (likely Plausible Analytics)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
pla.nea.moe
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for Linnea Gräf, a software developer.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No security.txt or incident response information available.
  4. Uses modern Astro framework and minimal tracking via plausible analytics.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. Domain is privacy protected but consistent with personal use.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  8. Contact primarily via email and social media links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework version 4.15.1, a modern static site generator that supports fast performance and good SEO. The site uses custom fonts and minimal JavaScript, including a deferred Plausible Analytics script for privacy-respecting tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS is managed via Porkbun. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible font choices, though accessibility features are basic. No CMS or complex backend detected, reducing attack surface but limiting dynamic content capabilities. The site’s technical implementation is clean and modern, with opportunities to improve security headers and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nea.moe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nea.moe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.