Skip to main content

Security report for navigator.rs

Navigator · Technology · Serbia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Navigator is a Serbian technology company specializing in comprehensive software solutions including ERP systems, warehouse management, mobile sales applications, and IT consulting services. Established since 2004, the company has a solid regional presence and offers a portfolio of products aimed at optimizing business processes across various sectors such as production, trade, and hospitality. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client testimonials, targeting business clients in need of IT modernization. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Maps API, and several performance and multilingual plugins. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images, providing a moderate performance experience. SEO and accessibility are addressed at a basic to good level. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or WHOIS data. Overall, Navigator presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with room for improvement in security policies and technical hardening. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navigator.rs

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Navigator holds a stable market position as a small but established IT solutions provider in Serbia, focusing on ERP and business intelligence software tailored for production, trade, and service industries. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized products like Business Navigator ERP and mobile sales applications, supported by IT consulting and outsourcing services. The company targets B2B clients seeking digital transformation and operational efficiency. Their partnership with Revolution Payment System indicates an ecosystem approach to integrated business solutions. Growth indicators include multilingual support and regional client testimonials. The business model is primarily service and software sales with ongoing support and development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent compliance and security gaps. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent, with no privacy protection that might obscure ownership. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements to reduce risk and improve compliance with GDPR and other standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ORION TELEKOM d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Navigator
Description
Navigator is a technology company specializing in the development and implementation of software solutions, IT consulting, outsourcing, and business intelligence services. They provide comprehensive information systems for production, trade, hospitality, and other service sectors, aiming to optimize and modernize business processes.
Key services
Business Navigator ERP system, Navigator Warehouse management, Mobile Navigator Droid for field sales, Navigator Web Reporter, IT consulting, Outsourcing, Custom IT solution development, Business intelligence
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery, Google Maps API, FontAwesome, SiteOrigin Panels, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), Autoptimize
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Serbian with English language option available.
  3. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and performance optimization.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with physical address, phone, and email.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented with a visible banner and acceptance mechanism.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies are published.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. Site performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching optimizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and multiple plugins for enhanced functionality including multilingual support (WPML), performance optimization (Autoptimize), and user interaction (Contact Form 7). The use of Google Maps API and FontAwesome icons enriches the user experience. Lazy loading and responsive design improve performance and mobile usability. However, no advanced frameworks beyond WordPress were detected, and hosting details are not explicit. The site shows moderate performance with potential for improvement in accessibility and SEO through further optimization and compliance with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navigator.rs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navigator.rs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.