Skip to main content

Security report for naspa.com

NaSPA · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NaSPA is a small, established non-profit organization focused on supporting technology professionals through career development, education, and networking services. The website is built on Squarespace and provides a range of services including job search, technical training, publications, and membership programs. The technical infrastructure is modern and uses standard web technologies with good mobile optimization and SSL security. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear professional and consistent with the organization's stated mission. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and secure login mechanisms, but lacks published security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism implemented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naspa.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NaSPA operates in the technology sector as a non-profit association serving network and systems professionals worldwide. Its business model revolves around membership fees, advertising, sponsorships, and educational offerings. The organization targets technology professionals, students, and military personnel seeking career advancement. The website's partnership with technical publishers like CRC Press and Cisco Press enhances its value proposition. Despite a long operational history, the domain registration status is unclear, which could impact trust. The organization maintains a focused niche with a stable market position but should improve transparency around domain registration and privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, secure login via a third-party service, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is incomplete due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate commitment to security and provide guidance for reporting issues.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to ensure transparency and reinforce legitimacy of the organization.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NaSPA
Description
NaSPA, a non-profit corporation, fosters a greater respect for network, mainframe, I.T., telecommunications, business continuity, and other professionals, while it improves employment and educational opportunities for thousands of technologists worldwide.
Key services
Career development resources, Job search and job posting services, Technical training courses, Membership programs, Publications archive, Advertising and sponsorship opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, JavaScript, StatCounter analytics, Typekit fonts, Sentrylogin for member login
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure login form via Sentrylogin

Analytics and tracking

Services
StatCounter
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
StatCounter
Marketing tools
StatCounter, Sentrylogin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on career development for technology professionals.
  3. Uses Squarespace CMS and standard web technologies.
  4. No privacy cookie banner despite privacy policy presence.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  7. Contact phone number is provided but no email addresses found in HTML.
  8. Social media links are not present or not detected.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. Login functionality uses third-party Sentrylogin service.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, leveraging its CMS capabilities and infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts via Typekit and integrates StatCounter for analytics and Sentrylogin for member authentication. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive design and uses canonical and Open Graph meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Performance is moderate, typical for a Squarespace site, with no critical technical issues detected. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naspa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naspa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.