Skip to main content

Security report for nanosystems.it

Nanosystems S.r.l. · Technology · Italy

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanosystems S.r.l. is an Italian technology company specializing in software solutions for remote support, backup, and IT management. Their product portfolio includes Supremo for remote desktop control, Uranium Backup for data protection, and Supremo Console for IT management. The company targets IT professionals and businesses seeking flexible and affordable IT solutions. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and scripts, including GDPR-compliant cookie management and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS and bot protection, but lacks published security policies and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, reducing domain transparency and trust. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security disclosures and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanosystems.it

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nanosystems.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,244
Employees
0
Customers
1,244
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nanosystems.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanosystems operates in the competitive IT software market, focusing on remote access and backup solutions. Their business model revolves around software licensing and subscription sales, supported by a reseller program. The company maintains a strong brand with consistent messaging and active social media channels. Their partnership with dedicated product domains (supremocontrol.com and uranium-backup.com) indicates a segmented product strategy. The company appears medium-sized with a clear focus on IT professionals and businesses globally. Growth indicators include multilingual support and active marketing campaigns such as Black Friday offers. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is unusual and should be monitored for potential risks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file, which are important for transparency and vulnerability management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Enhancing HTTP security headers and publishing formal security documentation would improve the security maturity level.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Improve HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Monitor and audit third-party scripts regularly to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Clarify WHOIS domain registration details to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nanosystems S.r.l.
VAT number
IT01085650446
Registration number
N. REA AP-111997
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanosystems S.r.l.
Description
Remote support, backup and IT management made easy and accessible: discover Nanosystems high-quality software.
Key services
Remote desktop control (Supremo), Data backup and endpoint protection (Uranium Backup), Web console for IT management (Supremo Console)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, nanoGDPR cookie management
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent management with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by GTM usage)
Marketing tools
nanoGDPR cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear product focus.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact likely via form.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. Social media presence on major platforms.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA integration. It uses modern CSS and JavaScript assets optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. The site loads quickly and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and multilingual support. Cookie consent is managed via a custom nanoGDPR script, ensuring GDPR compliance. No major technical debts or deprecated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanosystems.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanosystems.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.