Skip to main content

Security report for nanosystems.com

Nanosystems S.r.l. · Technology · Italy

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanosystems S.r.l. is an Italian technology company specializing in software solutions for IT professionals and businesses, focusing on remote support, backup, and IT management. Their key products include Supremo for remote desktop control, Uranium Backup for data protection, and Supremo Console for IT management. The company targets IT administrators and managed service providers with flexible and affordable software solutions. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and scripts, including GDPR-compliant cookie management and Google Tag Manager integration. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and bot protection, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the overall business credibility is supported by consistent branding and active social media channels. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and verifying domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanosystems.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanosystems operates in the competitive IT software market, offering specialized tools for remote access and backup. Their business model revolves around software licensing and subscriptions, supported by an e-commerce platform and reseller programs. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with dedicated product domains and social media engagement. Market positioning emphasizes affordability and flexibility, appealing to SMEs and IT professionals globally. Growth indicators include multilingual support and active marketing campaigns such as Black Friday promotions. The absence of detailed financial or founding year data limits deeper business intelligence, but the professional web presence and product portfolio suggest a stable medium-sized enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The lack of WHOIS registrant information is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trust and domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a commercial website but could be improved with enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add and verify security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nanosystems S.r.l.
VAT number
IT01085650446
Registration number
N. REA AP-111997
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanosystems S.r.l.
Description
Remote support, backup and IT management made easy and accessible: discover Nanosystems high-quality software.
Key services
Remote desktop control (Supremo), Data backup and endpoint protection (Uranium Backup), Web console for IT management (Supremo Console)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, nanoGDPR cookie consent
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted at IT professionals and businesses.
  3. Strong multilingual support with language switcher for 6 languages.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent management.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact form and physical address provided.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which reduces trust but website content is credible.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, WPML for multilingual support, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site uses custom CSS and JavaScript bundles for performance and user experience. It is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is fast with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. The site integrates cookie consent management compliant with GDPR. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks include missing security headers and reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanosystems.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanosystems.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.