Skip to main content

Security report for nanodators.lv

Nanodators · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanodators is an IT support and managed services provider primarily targeting small and medium businesses in Riga, Latvia, with additional focus on the UK market. Their business model includes direct client servicing and white-label partnerships, offering flexible and cost-effective IT support solutions including helpdesk and on-site staff. The website content is professional and clearly communicates their value proposition and service offerings. Technically, the website is built on GravCMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Leaflet for interactive features. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or limited digital marketing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL), but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, reducing attack surface. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and compliance documentation. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanodators.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanodators positions itself as a flexible and experienced IT support provider with a focus on small and medium enterprises in Riga and the UK. Their competitive advantage lies in combining offshore helpdesk support with local on-site staff to optimize costs. The company leverages partnerships with major vendors to broaden service offerings. The business model includes direct and white-label services, indicating a B2B focus. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting credibility. Absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence. No evident subsidiaries or parent companies are mentioned.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected in the HTML source. No forms or input fields reduce risk of injection attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response contacts or security policies are not disclosed. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are visible. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT services website but requires improvements in compliance documentation and header security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Add explicit incident response and security contact information to demonstrate readiness and transparency.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanodators
Description
Managed IT Services & Consultancy for Small and Medium Riga Businesses. Providing fast, efficient IT support with global experience and local prices.
Key services
Managed IT Services, IT Consultancy, Helpdesk Support, On-site IT Staff, Advanced Monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Leaflet.js
Frameworks
GravCMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and phone number in meta description.
  5. Website uses GravCMS and includes modern JS libraries like jQuery and Leaflet.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; SSL status unknown.
  7. No forms detected on the main page; contact likely via email or phone.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Content is professional and focused on IT support services in Riga and UK.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on GravCMS, a modern flat-file CMS, which reduces complexity and potential database vulnerabilities. It uses jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive map features and UI enhancements. The site loads CSS and JS assets locally, indicating self-hosting or controlled hosting environment. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical URLs. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanodators.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanodators.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.