Skip to main content

Security report for nano.lv

Nano IT SIA · Technology · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nano IT SIA operates as the largest hosting service provider in Latvia, offering a comprehensive portfolio of IT infrastructure services including web hosting, domain registration, VPS hosting, and server colocation. The company targets Latvian businesses and individuals seeking reliable and scalable hosting solutions. Their market position is strong, supported by a significant customer base and visible trust indicators such as client logos and abuse reporting mechanisms. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Select2, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Tawk.to for security and customer support. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. The hosting infrastructure is self-managed with a focus on data center resilience and DDoS protection. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, there is a lack of visible HTTP security headers and no public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, which are areas for improvement. The incident response process is partially addressed via an abuse report page. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with moderate technical and security maturity. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility to strengthen the security posture and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nano.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 6 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nano.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nano IT SIA holds a leading position in the Latvian hosting market, leveraging a service model focused on domain registration, hosting packages, VPS, and data center services. Their competitive advantage lies in local market dominance, a broad service offering, and a customer-centric approach with online account management and support. Revenue streams are primarily from subscription-based hosting plans and domain sales. The company targets SMEs and individual customers in Latvia, with growth potential through enhanced digital services and security offerings. Partnerships with global service providers like Google for analytics and advertising are evident. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and visible trust signals, supporting customer confidence and retention.

Security posture

The security posture of Nano IT SIA is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms demonstrate GDPR compliance awareness. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program is found, limiting transparency and incident readiness. The presence of an abuse report page is positive but insufficient alone. No data protection officer contact or detailed incident response information is available. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to customers and stakeholders.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nano IT SIA
Description
Nano IT SIA is the largest hosting service provider in Latvia by number of domains and websites. They offer hosting, domain registration, VPS, and server colocation services.
Key services
Web hosting, Domain registration, VPS hosting, Server colocation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Select2, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, Tawk.to chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by origin-trial meta and Google Analytics script loaded via HTTPS)
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • DDoS protection mentioned for data center

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-685001173)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Strong focus on hosting and IT infrastructure services in Latvia.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  4. No direct email addresses or phone numbers explicitly shown on homepage; contact via contact page.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and external trusted services.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source; security posture could be improved.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook page link.
  9. No explicit security policy or data protection officer contact found.
  10. Incident response contact available via abuse report page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery and Select2, with styling supported by Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Ads for marketing and tracking purposes, alongside Tawk.to for live chat support. The site is hosted on infrastructure managed by Nano IT SIA, with a modern data center featuring DDoS protection and redundant power. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with fallback support for older browsers, indicating attention to compatibility. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could be enhanced for security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nano.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nano.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.