Skip to main content

Security report for nano.lv

Nano IT SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nano IT SIA operates as the leading hosting service provider in Latvia, specializing in web hosting, email hosting, domain registration, VPS, and server colocation services. The company targets Latvian businesses and individuals requiring reliable and scalable hosting solutions. Their market position is strong, supported by a large client base managing over 30,000 domains and a reputation for responsive customer support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, and FontAwesome, integrated with WHMCS for client management and e-commerce functionality. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and advertising tracking, with a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility basics. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and mentions advanced data center protections such as DDoS mitigation and 24/7 monitoring. However, explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data aligns with the business claims, reinforcing domain legitimacy. Overall, Nano IT SIA presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and compliance posture. Strategic improvements could include publishing detailed security policies and enhancing HTTP security headers to further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nano.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nano IT SIA holds a dominant position in the Latvian hosting market, leveraging a service model focused on comprehensive hosting solutions including shared hosting, VPS, domain registration, and data center services. Their revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based hosting plans and value-added services such as server colocation. The company targets SMEs and individual customers in Latvia, emphasizing local market leadership and reliability. The presence of client logos and a fast support response time are key trust signals. The integration with WHMCS suggests mature operational processes and customer management. The company’s marketing ecosystem includes Google Ads and live chat support, enhancing customer engagement and conversion. Strategically, Nano IT SIA benefits from a strong local brand and technical infrastructure but could explore expanding incident response transparency and certifications to enhance competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented with granular user control, reflecting GDPR compliance. The data center claims include modern security controls such as firewalls with DDoS protection, redundant power, and 24/7 monitoring. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, or a security.txt file limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Tawk.to is consent-gated, reducing privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie management and privacy policy. Incident response contact channels such as abuse@ or security@ emails are not publicly listed, which is a gap. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by formalizing and publishing security governance documents and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and report HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information with explicit security and abuse reporting channels to improve incident handling.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nano IT SIA
Description
Nano IT SIA is the largest hosting service provider in Latvia by number of domains and websites. They offer hosting, VPS, domain registration, and server colocation services.
Key services
Web hosting, Email hosting, Domain registration, VPS hosting, Server colocation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Select2, FontAwesome, Bootstrap, WHMCS (implied by cookie names and cart URLs), Google Tag Manager, Tawk.to chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WHMCS client portal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URLs)
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of firewall and DDoS protection mentioned in content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Google Ads (AW-685001173)
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories.
  3. Clear business focus on hosting and domain services in Latvia.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected in HTML content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and UX.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No visible email addresses or phone numbers on homepage; contact via contact page link.
  8. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  9. Use of Google Analytics and Google Ads with consent-based loading.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, and FontAwesome, integrated with WHMCS for client and billing management. The use of Google Fonts and CDN-hosted libraries indicates standard performance optimization practices. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features at a basic level. Cookie consent is implemented with a detailed modal and category-based controls, reflecting good privacy practices. Performance is moderate, with no evident broken elements or errors in the HTML content. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and advertising tracking, loaded conditionally based on user consent, which is a best practice for privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility further and to implement advanced security headers for enhanced protection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium25 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nano.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nano.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.