Skip to main content

Security report for namespace.so

Namespace Labs Inc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Namespace Labs Inc operates the website namespace.so, providing a SaaS platform focused on accelerating developer workflows through high-performance compute services. Their offerings include managed GitHub runners, remote Docker image building, end-to-end previews, and private container registries, targeting software engineering teams and organizations seeking faster build and test cycles. The company positions itself as a technology innovator with a strong emphasis on developer infrastructure performance and cost efficiency. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear, relevant content that aligns well with its target audience and business model. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses HTTPS, ensuring good performance and security. However, some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are not enabled, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Privacy compliance is mostly addressed with comprehensive privacy and terms pages, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking scripts. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with high trustworthiness and good security posture, suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching namespace.so

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Namespace Labs is a small technology company founded in 2021, focusing on developer infrastructure acceleration. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering cloud compute services that integrate with popular CI/CD tools like GitHub Actions and Docker. The company targets fast-moving software engineering teams and has established trust with notable clients such as Buildkite, Vanta, and DFINITY. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering significantly faster build and test times with minimal workflow changes. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and a trust center, indicating a customer-centric approach. Partnerships and integrations with major developer platforms enhance their ecosystem. Growth indicators include active blog, changelog, and documentation resources. The absence of explicit contact details may limit direct customer engagement but is mitigated by social media and support links.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a solid foundation for secure communications. No WAF or security challenge pages were detected, indicating open accessibility. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. The site lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could hinder security incident management transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional headers, DNSSEC, and explicit security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish explicit incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance contact information availability on the website to improve customer trust and support accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Namespace Labs Inc
Description
Namespace accelerates the development workflow of fast-moving software engineering teams. Best-in-class compute and development-supporting services that lead to 2x-10x faster builds, tests, and more.
Key services
Managed GitHub Runners, Remote Docker image building, End-to-end previews, Private Container Registry, Observability and metrics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
GitHub Actions, Docker, Bazel, Turborepo, Nix, CircleCI
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
udata.namespace.so
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear focus on developer workflow acceleration.
  3. Strong emphasis on GitHub Actions and Docker build acceleration.
  4. Presence of trust signals such as customer logos and trust center.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  6. Privacy and terms pages are present and comprehensive.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  10. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and scalable front-end. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare DNS with optimized delivery of assets such as Google Fonts and SVG graphics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD for the website entity. Performance is fast with deferred script loading and preconnect hints. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The use of tracking scripts for user interaction analytics is moderate, but privacy compliance could be improved. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with namespace.so. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review namespace.so.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.