Skip to main content

Security report for namespace.ee

Namespace OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Namespace OÜ is a small Estonian digital agency specializing in full-service software development with expertise in Python, API, and React.js technologies. The company targets businesses seeking custom digital applications and API integrations, positioning itself as a niche technology service provider with a portfolio of notable projects such as Navirec, GSMtasks, and Parcelfellows. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and project showcases. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks including React.js and Next.js, with integrations for Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cal.com scheduling. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses standard analytics scripts but lacks explicit security headers and visible security policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a consistent and legitimate registration. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching namespace.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Namespace OÜ operates as a specialized digital agency focusing on software development services primarily for business clients requiring Python, API, and React.js expertise. Their business model revolves around project-based engagements and long-term client partnerships, as evidenced by their portfolio of technology-driven clients in fleet management, mobile workforce, and logistics sectors. The company leverages modern web technologies to deliver scalable and maintainable solutions. Growth indicators include a diverse client base and integration with popular e-commerce and logistics platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes clients with distinct domain names, suggesting a collaborative approach. The company maintains a clear digital presence but lacks publicly disclosed certifications or compliance statements, which could be strategic areas for future development.

Security posture

The current security posture of Namespace OÜ's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No visible incident response or security policy pages are present, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The use of third-party analytics and scheduling scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory scrutiny under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity level is adequate but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Create and display a security policy or incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Namespace OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Namespace OÜ
Description
Full service digital agency based in Tallinn. We are Python, API and React.js experts. Creating applications that matter.
Key services
Full-service digital solutions, Python development, API development, React.js development, Mobile app development, Custom software solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React.js, Next.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cal.com scheduling embed
Frameworks
React.js, Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cal.com scheduling
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency site with clear branding and portfolio.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React.js and Next.js frameworks, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. Integration with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager supports data-driven insights, while Cal.com provides embedded scheduling functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and prefetching of resources. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. The technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with namespace.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review namespace.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.