Skip to main content

Security report for nameshield.net

Nameshield · Technology · France

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

90/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nameshield is a French-based company specializing in the security and management of strategic domain names and associated services. Positioned as a leading registrar certified under ISO 27001, the company offers a comprehensive suite of cybersecurity solutions including DNS protection, SSL/TLS certificates, DMARC implementation, and intellectual property protection. Their market position is reinforced by memberships in recognized cybersecurity organizations and certifications, highlighting a strong commitment to security and compliance. The website infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital presence. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with clear navigation and professional design. Security best practices are observed, including HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, although there is room for improvement in public vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact transparency. The security posture is strong, supported by ISO 27001 certification and multiple cybersecurity memberships. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, which slightly reduces transparency but does not significantly detract from the overall legitimacy given the strong trust signals on the site. Overall, Nameshield presents a secure, professional, and trustworthy online presence suitable for enterprise clients seeking domain and cybersecurity services. Strategic recommendations include enhancing vulnerability disclosure policies and incident response contact clarity to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nameshield.net

This scan found 9 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
90

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nameshield.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
68
Employees
0
Customers
68
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nameshield.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nameshield operates in the technology sector focusing on domain name registration and cybersecurity services. Their business model revolves around providing secure domain management, intellectual property protection, and cybersecurity solutions to enterprises and organizations. The company leverages certifications and memberships to differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their target customers are medium to large enterprises requiring robust domain and digital asset protection. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with recognized cybersecurity bodies and uses modern marketing and analytics tools to engage clients. Growth indicators include active participation in industry events and continuous content publication. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or alternative registration, which is common but should be monitored for transparency.

Security posture

Nameshield demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certification and adherence to cybersecurity best practices. The website uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance are implemented, reflecting good data protection practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of explicit incident response contact emails are areas for improvement. Overall, the security culture appears strong, but transparency in incident handling could be enhanced to meet best practices fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Add explicit security incident response contact emails such as security@ or abuse@ to improve transparency.
  3. Implement or confirm DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Clearly communicate data retention policies related to analytics and cookies to comply with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nameshield
Description
Premier registrar certifié ISO 27001, Nameshield sécurise vos noms de domaine stratégiques et services associés. Découvrez nos solutions.
Key services
Domain name management, Cybersecurity solutions, Intellectual property protection, Dot Brand domain extensions, Registry lock, SSL/TLS certificates, DMARC implementation, Domain recovery and legal actions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, jQuery
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Secure login portal
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong emphasis on cybersecurity and domain name protection services.
  3. Multiple certifications and memberships reinforce trustworthiness.
  4. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, which slightly impacts transparency.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Analytics and HubSpot for user tracking and marketing automation. The use of jQuery and Google Tag Manager indicates a modern tech stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers, indicating a secure hosting environment. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The site structure is clear and well-organized, supporting excellent user experience and SEO. Opportunities exist to improve technical transparency around security disclosures and incident response.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nameshield.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nameshield.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.