Skip to main content

Security report for name.store

DotServe Inc. · Technology · India

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Name.store is a domain registrar specializing in innovative domain extensions and seamless domain management services. They offer professional email solutions via Titan and easy domain connections to popular platforms such as Shopify, Instagram, and Wix. The company operates through a global partner network, with a strong presence in India under DotServe Inc. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and security features including Google reCAPTCHA. Privacy and legal policies are comprehensive and accessible via popups, demonstrating a commitment to compliance and user transparency. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure form handling, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy domain registration service with good technical implementation and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching name.store

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention name.store, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for name.store right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets individuals and businesses seeking domain registration and management, leveraging a broad portfolio of TLDs and integrated services like professional email and platform connectivity. Their business model is based on reseller partnerships and global domain management. The company shows consistent branding and provides detailed legal and privacy documentation, enhancing trust. The presence of abuse contact and detailed terms indicates a mature operational framework. The use of analytics and user behavior tracking tools like Mouseflow suggests a focus on optimizing user experience and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with valid SSL, uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, and integrates security-focused plugins. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is noted as an area for improvement. The site demonstrates good security hygiene but could enhance its defenses by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility and accessibility of incident response contacts to improve user trust and response readiness.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DotServe Inc.
Registration number
registration number or
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DotServe Inc.
Description
Name.store is a domain registrar offering innovative new domain extensions to build a strong online presence. Backed by a global network, they ensure seamless and reliable domain management. They provide professional email with Titan and hassle-free domain connections to platforms like Shopify, Instagram, Wix, and more.
Key services
Domain registration, Professional email (Titan), Domain connection to platforms (Shopify, Instagram, Wix, etc.)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7, Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7, Popup Maker, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Ays Popup Box
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Use of security plugins (Popup Maker, Ays Popup Box)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mouseflow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Mouseflow
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive domain registration terms covering many TLDs
  2. Detailed privacy and legal policies available via popups
  3. Use of modern web technologies and security measures
  4. Clear contact information with abuse email provided
  5. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  6. Good integration of third-party services like Google Analytics and Mouseflow
  7. Strong focus on domain registration and management services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7, Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7, and Popup Maker. It uses Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for security. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of caching indicated by tablepress cache. The site integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Mouseflow for user behavior tracking. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with name.store. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review name.store.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.