Skip to main content

Security report for nam.cz

NAM system, a.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NAM system, a.s. is a Czech-based company specializing in the development of modern monitoring technologies, including solutions for vehicles, assets, and personal safety. With over 35 years of experience, the company positions itself as a reliable and quality-focused provider offering 24/7 support. Their business model centers on technology development and collaboration with other technology developers to secure and monitor objects, people, and vehicles. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses and organizations requiring advanced monitoring solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, integrating modern technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA for form security, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. The site is hosted likely via a Czech hosting provider, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and implements cookie consent with granular categories. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Security headers are not explicitly visible but likely present. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture and business credibility, though it would benefit from publishing privacy and security policies and providing direct contact information for security incidents. The domain's WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a long-established presence and high legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nam.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nam.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,378
Employees
0
Customers
5,378
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
28%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nam.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NAM system operates in the technology sector with a focus on monitoring and security solutions for transportation, assets, and personal safety. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience (35+ years), quality and reliability emphasis, and 24/7 support. The business model involves technology development and partnerships with other technology developers. The target customers are organizations needing monitoring of vehicles, buildings, and individuals, including social care systems. The company maintains a professional online presence with structured data and social media engagement (Facebook). Growth indicators include modernized website infrastructure and active marketing via Google Tag Manager. No direct revenue streams or pricing models are disclosed on the site. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed beyond cooperation with technology developers.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, Google reCAPTCHA integration to mitigate automated abuse, and a cookie consent mechanism respecting user privacy preferences. The use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode indicates compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Security headers are not explicitly documented, and no direct contact emails for security or abuse are provided. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add a security policy and incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance visibility and configuration of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAM system, a.s.
Description
We develop the most modern monitoring technologies. We cooperate with developers of technologies for monitoring and securing objects, people and vehicles.
Key services
Monitoring technologies, GPS trackers, Alarm Receiving Centres, Electronic Fire Systems, Security solutions for social care
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Cookie Consent (orestbida/cookieconsent)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent with granular consent categories
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with modern security practices
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent implemented with granular categories
  4. Contact available via form but no direct emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. Business is well described with structured data and clear branding
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. Use of Google services for analytics and tag management
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides a flexible and visually appealing design. It leverages Google Fonts for typography, Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integration. The site uses a cookie consent library to comply with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be managed by a Czech provider, consistent with the domain's nameservers. Performance is moderate, with some optimizations possible in loading speed and accessibility. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and article information. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for enhanced security header configurations and formal privacy/security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nam.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nam.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.