Skip to main content

Security report for myipnumber.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MyIpNumber.com is a small informational website dedicated to providing users with their IP address and educational content about IP numbers, DNS, NAT, and related internet technologies. The site targets general internet users seeking to understand their IP address and networking concepts. It operates primarily through advertising revenue, leveraging Google Adsense and social sharing tools like AddThis. The website content is straightforward, focusing on technical explanations and IP address display without commercial transactions or user accounts. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded Google Adsense scripts for monetization. The design and navigation are functional but basic, with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced hosting or CDN usage. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS/SSL information in the provided data, and no security headers are detected. There are no privacy or cookie policies, nor contact information for security or incident response. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and transparency. No vulnerabilities or malicious content are evident, but the security posture is weak due to missing best practices. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences, providing educational content without adult or explicit material. However, the lack of privacy compliance, security measures, and contact information limits trustworthiness and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myipnumber.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MyIpNumber.com occupies a niche in the technology sector, focusing on IP address information and networking education. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, primarily through Google Adsense. The site does not display clear business registration or contact details, which limits its credibility and potential for partnerships. The target audience is broad, encompassing general internet users interested in IP-related information. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its straightforward, no-frills presentation of IP data and related educational content. Growth potential may be limited without enhancements in user engagement, trust signals, and expanded service offerings. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. Key gaps include the absence of HTTPS/SSL confirmation, lack of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. While no active vulnerabilities or malicious indicators are found, the site does not follow several security best practices, exposing it to potential risks such as data interception or user mistrust. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with data protection regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enhance website security by adding standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
MyIpNumber.com finds your IP address and gives information on IP numbers and addresses, DNS, and related technology.
Key services
IP address display, IP address lookup, Information on IP, DNS, NAT, IPv6, Links to related tools
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Adsense
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Site relies on Google Adsense and AddThis for advertising and social sharing.
  5. Content is educational and focused on IP address information.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status could be determined from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  8. Site design and navigation are basic but functional.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with embedded Google Adsense scripts for advertising. No modern web frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a simple, possibly static site architecture. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. There is no evidence of CDN usage or advanced hosting infrastructure. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myipnumber.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myipnumber.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.