Skip to main content

Security report for myepico.com

Epico International s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Epico International s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in premium technology accessories, including wireless power banks, chargers, protective cases, and connectivity peripherals primarily targeting Apple device users and other electronics consumers. The company operates an e-commerce platform with a B2B portal, positioning itself as a niche player in the technology retail sector. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides multilingual support, enhancing user experience and accessibility. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and CookieYes for security and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and form protections, though additional security headers could improve defenses. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly, but consistent company information, physical addresses, and active social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy and compliance practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myepico.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Epico targets consumers and businesses seeking high-quality electronic accessories, focusing on Apple ecosystem products and wireless charging technologies. Their business model combines direct e-commerce sales with B2B offerings, indicating diversified revenue streams. The company maintains a consistent brand image and engages customers via multiple social media channels. The presence of physical offices and warehouses in the Czech Republic suggests a medium-sized operation with established logistics. The lack of visible certifications or security policies indicates potential areas for growth in trust and compliance. The company’s market position appears stable within its niche, leveraging product innovation such as GaN chargers and Qi2 wireless technology to differentiate from competitors.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse, reflecting good baseline security practices. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy pages were found, limiting transparency on handling security events. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but is somewhat mitigated by visible company details. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in headers and documented policies to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Consider domain WHOIS privacy review or update to improve domain trustworthiness and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Epico International s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ02897750
Registration number
02897750
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Epico International s.r.o.
Description
Epico offers a range of technology accessories including power banks, chargers, protective cases, and connectivity peripherals primarily for Apple devices and other electronics.
Key services
Product sales of charging solutions, Protective accessories, Wireless charging technology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes Consent, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
CookieYes, Mailchimp (via list-manage.com)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern but mitigated by visible company data.
  6. Multiple social media channels linked, enhancing trust.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern frontend stack including jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. It uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and CookieYes for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy and security compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages, enhancing reach and usability. Performance appears moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is solid for an e-commerce platform but could benefit from modernization in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myepico.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myepico.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.