Skip to main content

Security report for mycampusdigital.io

Universia · Education · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website analyzed is a Single Sign-On (SSO) login portal branded as Campusb2b under the Universia network, targeting users in the education sector who require access to campus-related digital services. The platform facilitates secure user authentication for associated services such as mycampusdigital.io. The business model focuses on providing authentication and access management solutions tailored for educational institutions and their communities. The site presents a consistent brand image with Universia logos and uses HTTPS to secure user credentials during login. From a technical perspective, the site employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with specific scripts for password policy enforcement and validation. The performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional. However, the site lacks advanced SEO features, accessibility enhancements, and comprehensive metadata. No content management system or hosting provider information is discernible from the data provided. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is enforced, and password policy scripts are present, but critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS are missing. No privacy or cookie policies are visible, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which limits compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data for the domain sso.universia.net is unavailable, likely because it is a subdomain, which is typical but reduces transparency. No web application firewall or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers, visible privacy and cookie policies, improved accessibility, and clearer contact information to increase trust and compliance. The domain's legitimacy is supported by branding and HTTPS but lacks WHOIS transparency. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen the platform's security posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mycampusdigital.io

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Universia operates in the education sector, providing digital authentication services through its Campusb2b platform. The business targets educational institutions and their users, offering Single Sign-On capabilities to streamline access to multiple campus-related digital services. The business model is B2B focused, relying on partnerships with educational platforms such as mycampusdigital.io. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and appears to have a medium-sized operation based on the technical sophistication and service scope. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or advertising efforts on the login page, indicating a focus on service reliability over customer acquisition at this touchpoint. The lack of visible contact information and policies suggests a potential area for operational improvement. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The use of HTTPS ensures encrypted communication for user credentials, and the inclusion of password policy and validation scripts indicates attention to secure authentication practices. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No privacy or cookie policies are presented, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. The lack of incident response contact information further limits the site's readiness to handle security events. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, enhancements are needed to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies on the login page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add visible contact information and incident response channels to facilitate security reporting and user support.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to enhance user experience across devices and for users with disabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata and consider structured data implementation to improve search engine visibility and indexing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Universia
Description
Universia provides a Single Sign-On (SSO) authentication service for Campusb2b operations, enabling users to log in securely to access their accounts on associated platforms such as mycampusdigital.io.
Key services
Single Sign-On authentication, User account access management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced on login form
  • Password policy and validation scripts included

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Campusb2b under Universia branding
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page
  3. No contact information or security incident response details provided
  4. No visible analytics or advertising scripts detected
  5. Site uses HTTPS and includes password policy scripts
  6. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, likely because sso.universia.net is a subdomain
  7. Minimal SEO and accessibility features present
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with specific scripts dedicated to password policy enforcement and validation. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted data transmission. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and content type, but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO and social sharing. No content management system or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site does not include analytics or advertising scripts, indicating minimal tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mycampusdigital.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mycampusdigital.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.