Skip to main content

Security report for my.locker

Orange Domains · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orange Domains operates the .locker top-level domain, providing a unique Web3 digital identity solution that bridges traditional Web2 domain names with blockchain-based identities on Bitcoin and Ethereum. The company positions itself as an innovative player in the domain registration and Web3 identity space, leveraging partnerships with established registrars and blockchain ecosystem leaders. Their service targets users seeking a unified digital identity across Web2 and Web3 platforms. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies, integrates Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing, and employs secure HTTPS and security headers. However, it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and explicit security or incident response policies. The security posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities, but privacy compliance could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-branded, with a clear business model and good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching my.locker

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its ICANN designation and partnerships with Tucows, Hiro Systems, and Trust Machines to establish credibility and market presence. Its business model revolves around domain registration and Web3 identity provisioning, targeting blockchain users and domain registrants. The presence of testimonials from industry leaders and ecosystem partners indicates strong industry relationships. The company appears to be a small but focused technology startup with a niche in blockchain domain services. Revenue likely derives from domain sales and associated digital identity services. The partnership ecosystem and integration with Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains provide competitive advantages and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Google Tag Manager and HubSpot forms is controlled and standard. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No cookie consent banner is present despite tracking scripts, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability and compliance.
  5. Include explicit GDPR compliance statements and data retention policies in the privacy policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orange Domains
Description
.locker is a solution that bridges Web2 domain names with Web3 digital identities. It combines a domain name with a Web3 digital identity that resolves on Bitcoin and Ethereum to give users one name for Web2 + Web3.
Key services
Domain name registration (.locker domains), Web3 digital identity setup and management, Integration with Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts (Ubuntu), AL Web SDK
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on bridging traditional domain names with Web3 digital identities.
  3. Strong partnerships and testimonials enhance trust.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms only.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite tracking scripts present.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and HubSpot for form management. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business needs, with opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with my.locker. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review my.locker.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.