Skip to main content

Security report for mxana.com

MXANA · Technology · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MXANA is a Chinese website analytics and data analysis platform focused on providing free, reliable, and efficient traffic statistics and monitoring services primarily for developers and small to medium enterprises. The platform offers features such as heatmaps, error monitoring, real-time data analysis, and trend forecasting, positioning itself as a comprehensive tool for website and app performance optimization. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting a Chinese-speaking audience with a focus on transparency and trustworthiness, supported by customer testimonials and regulatory compliance indicators such as ICP and public security备案 numbers. Technically, MXANA employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and Swiper JS for responsive design and interactive elements. The site integrates its own JavaScript SDK for analytics data collection, indicating a proprietary analytics infrastructure. While the site appears performant and mobile-optimized, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS for secure communication, but lacks visible security headers and formalized security or incident response policies. No contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures is provided, which could hinder timely response to security issues. The data collection practices appear extensive via the embedded SDK, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, MXANA presents as a functional and professional analytics platform with a solid business model and market positioning in China. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency, privacy documentation, and security best practices lowers its trust and security posture. Strategic improvements in these areas are recommended to enhance compliance, user trust, and resilience against security threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mxana.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MXANA operates in the technology sector, providing free website analytics and monitoring services to developers and SMEs in China. Its competitive advantage lies in offering comprehensive analytics features without traffic limits or forced upgrades, appealing to cost-conscious users. The business model is freemium-like but currently fully free, likely monetizing through ancillary services or data insights. The platform targets multiple industries including e-commerce, media, and gaming, as evidenced by customer case studies. MXANA's ecosystem includes a community forum and integration capabilities, supporting user engagement and platform extensibility. Growth indicators include high daily active user counts in testimonials and extensive SDK deployment. However, the lack of transparent domain registration and formal privacy policies may impact long-term credibility and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

MXANA demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS usage ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are evident, limiting transparency and preparedness. The embedded analytics SDK suggests extensive user tracking, but without clear privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, raising compliance concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. To improve security posture, MXANA should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and security policies, establish incident response contacts, and ensure compliance with data protection laws.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR and local compliance.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to facilitate security issue reporting and resolution.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MXANA
Description
MXANA专注网站统计与数据分析，以精准、可信、高效的数据服务为核心，累计为千万应用提供流量统计，致力于为开发者及中小企业提供专业的数据工具与解决方案。
Key services
网站流量统计, 热点图分析, 错误监测, 实时数据监控, 趋势分析, 网站监控与故障提醒
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Swiper JS, JavaScript, Custom JS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
MXANA自有统计SDK
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
mxana.tacool.com/sdk.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Website uses HTTPS (implied by external links to dash.mxana.com login pages).
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  6. Business model is free website analytics and monitoring platform targeting developers and SMEs.
  7. Contains customer testimonials and industry use cases for e-commerce, media, and gaming sectors.
  8. Includes ICP and public security备案 numbers indicating Chinese regulatory compliance.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and Swiper JS for interactive carousels and sliders. The use of a proprietary JavaScript SDK for analytics indicates a custom-built data collection infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and features clear navigation and structured content. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider details. Performance appears moderate with no obvious broken elements. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions, but accessibility features are basic. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by integrating security best practices, improving accessibility, and formalizing privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mxana.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mxana.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.