Skip to main content

Security report for musupoga.lv

SIA IDEJU LAUKS · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mūsu Poga is a private preschool educational institution based in Riga, Latvia, operating for approximately 10 to 15 years. The organization combines alternative pedagogical methods such as Waldorf and Montessori to provide a nurturing and structured learning environment for children aged 1.6 to 7 years. The website reflects a small-scale, community-focused business model targeting parents seeking quality early childhood education. The institution maintains active social media channels and provides clear contact information, enhancing its accessibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates modern tools such as Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, some security best practices like security headers and incident response information are missing, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption and bot protection but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site presents a moderate to good security posture with room for enhancement in transparency and technical safeguards. The overall risk is low given the nature of the business and the content provided. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility features to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching musupoga.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention musupoga.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for musupoga.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mūsu Poga occupies a niche segment in the Latvian early childhood education market, leveraging a blend of classical and alternative pedagogies to differentiate itself. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on private preschool education with a strong emphasis on individualized child development and parental collaboration. The company appears to have stable operations with a clear target audience and a consistent brand presence. The use of social media and a privacy-conscious website indicates awareness of modern digital engagement practices. However, the lack of visible WHOIS data and formal security policies suggests areas for operational transparency improvement. The company is likely small in size but well-positioned locally with potential for growth through enhanced digital and security maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA integration to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. The lack of WHOIS data restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small educational institution but with opportunities for strengthening to reduce risk exposure and enhance stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA IDEJU LAUKS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA IDEJU LAUKS
Description
Privātā pirmsskolas izglītības iestāde ar 10-15 gadu vēsturi, kas izmanto alternatīvās un klasiskās pedagoģijas metodes, piemēram, Valdorfpedagoģiju un Montessori.
Key services
Pirmsskolas izglītība, Valdorfpedagoģija, Montessori pedagoģija, Āra pedagoģija, Mūzikas nodarbības
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Enfold Theme 7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts, Adobe Fonts, Lottie Player
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based private preschool site in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured and informative about pedagogical approaches.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA are used for analytics and bot protection.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 with the Enfold theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. Integration of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager provides robust analytics capabilities. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for bot mitigation. The site loads Google Fonts and Adobe Fonts for typography, and uses Lottie Player for animations. Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS/JS assets. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by Yoast and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with musupoga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review musupoga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.