Security report for municode.com
CivicPlus LLC · Technology · N/a
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
CivicPlus LLC operates a comprehensive software platform focused on empowering local governments and municipalities with technology solutions that enhance operational efficiency and resident engagement. Their flagship offering includes the Municode Codification software and services, which provide municipalities with tools for managing municipal codes, ordinances, and related legislative documentation. The company positions itself as a leader in integrated government technology, leveraging over 70 years of codification expertise through its acquisition of Municode. CivicPlus targets government clerks, city managers, and public sector organizations, offering a broad suite of products including agenda and meeting management, mass notification systems, and community development tools. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, although explicit security headers could be more clearly implemented. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. The security posture is solid, but the absence of a public incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy is a minor gap. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is not uncommon for commercial entities using privacy services or recent domain registrations. Overall, the website and business present a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, with strong content quality and technical implementation. Strategically, CivicPlus should consider publishing explicit security headers, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and providing clear incident response contacts to further enhance trust and security posture. These steps will align well with their government clientele's expectations and regulatory requirements.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 68/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching municode.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 75
- Security headers
- 65
- Email security
- 75
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 68
- Average
- 77
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and explicitly configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
- Publish a clear incident response contact page or email to facilitate timely reporting and handling of security incidents.
- Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
- Continue to maintain and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR and CCPA compliance.
- Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness, or clearly communicate privacy protection rationale.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- CivicPlus LLC
- Description
- CivicPlus is a software platform that powers and empowers the public sector with technology that boosts efficiency and resident satisfaction. They provide Municode codification software and services to help municipalities manage their municipal codes effectively.
- Key services
- Codification and Recodification, Supplementation and Self-Publishing Software, Online Code Hosting, Agenda and Meeting Management Integration, Municipal Websites, Mass Notification System, Social Media Archiving, 311 CRM System, Community Development, Asset Management
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Vidyard video player, Algolia Autocomplete
- Frameworks
- WordPress
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- excellent
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of secure external scripts
- Cookie consent banner present
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
- Marketing tools
- HubSpot, Algolia
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
- Strong focus on government technology solutions, especially codification software.
- Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
- No exposed sensitive information or security misconfigurations detected.
- WHOIS data is missing, which slightly impacts trust but not critical given website professionalism.
- No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact found.
- Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
- Contact information includes phone and contact forms but no direct emails found.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 77/100Low26 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with municode.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review municode.com.