Skip to main content

Security report for multisoft.lv

MULTISOFT SIA · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Multisoft.lv is a small technology service provider based in Latvia, specializing in web and mobile software programming, UI & UX design, and mobile app development services. The company positions itself as a programming services outsourcing provider targeting businesses seeking software development and design solutions. The website content is professional and well-structured, providing clear navigation and a good user experience. However, the site lacks visible contact information, privacy policies, and terms of service, which limits transparency and user trust. From a technical perspective, the website uses standard web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site appears mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Security headers are not detected, and SSL configuration details are unavailable, indicating potential areas for security improvement. The security posture is moderate but limited by the absence of visible security policies, incident response contacts, and security best practices such as security headers. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on website content and business presence. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding clear contact information, enhancing security headers and SSL configuration, and conducting regular security audits to improve compliance and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching multisoft.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Multisoft.lv operates in the technology sector as a small-sized software development and design outsourcing company. Its business model focuses on providing programming, UI & UX design, and mobile app development services to other businesses. The company targets clients looking for professional software solutions and design expertise. The website branding is consistent and professional, though it lacks explicit trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may impact customer confidence. The company appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary relationships indicated. The use of Google Analytics suggests an interest in understanding user behavior and marketing effectiveness. Growth opportunities may include expanding transparency and compliance to attract larger clients.

Security posture

The current security posture of multisoft.lv is moderate but incomplete. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) were found. The site does not appear to use a Web Application Firewall or other advanced security mechanisms. To improve security maturity, the company should implement security headers, publish security and privacy policies, and establish incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance transparency and credibility.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MULTISOFT SIA
Description
Web and Mobile software programming and design services
Key services
Programming, UI & UX Design, Mobile apps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided in the HTML content
  4. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  6. No social media links or company contact emails found
  7. Company name MULTISOFT SIA is visible in footer
  8. Website content is focused on programming and design services
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses favicon and apple-touch-icon assets for cross-platform compatibility. No CMS or backend platform was identified from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and keywords tags included. The lack of security headers and absence of visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms indicate areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with multisoft.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review multisoft.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.