Skip to main content

Security report for mspetrov.cz

MŠ Petrov · Education · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MŠ Petrov operates as a small local kindergarten located in Petrov, Czech Republic, providing preschool education and childcare services. The website presents a clear and consistent brand image with detailed descriptions of its educational offerings and community engagement. The institution targets parents and guardians of young children in the local area, emphasizing a nurturing and creative learning environment. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, and is built on a CMS platform likely provided by Galileo Corporation. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy documentation. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and contact information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and business credibility but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mspetrov.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions MŠ Petrov as a community-focused educational institution with a clear mission to support early childhood development. Its partnerships with local government and the Ministry of Education indicate alignment with public sector standards. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on service provision rather than revenue generation. The presence of official contact details and links to partner sites enhances credibility. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the institution, but the modern facilities and project funding suggest investment in quality. The partnership ecosystem includes local municipality and government education bodies, as well as the CMS provider. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved digital compliance and security to maintain trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes potential risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, though no direct malicious indicators are present. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and terms of service documents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory frameworks like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MŠ Petrov
Description
Mateřinka v Petrově je novostavba jednotřídní mateřské školy umístěná v rozlehlé zahradě, zaměřená na podporu zvídavých dětí s kvalitními pedagogickými službami a vybavením.
Key services
Preschool education, Childcare, Extracurricular activities, Meal services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, Mmenu.js, Highslide JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the kindergarten
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Cookie consent script is present indicating some privacy awareness
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain may not be properly registered or is privacy protected
  5. No security headers detected, potential area for improvement
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and emails
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and is mobile optimized
  9. No signs of malicious or adult content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js for slideshows, and Mmenu.js for navigation menus, indicating a moderately modern front-end stack. The CMS appears to be Galileo Corporation's proprietary system, as inferred from footer credits and script paths. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts and stylesheets loaded. No advanced frameworks like React or Angular are detected. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools, suggesting minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mspetrov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mspetrov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.