Skip to main content

Security report for mrmoco.com

Mark Roberts Motion Control · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mark Roberts Motion Control is a well-established company specializing in the design and manufacture of advanced motion control camera rigs and broadcast robotics solutions. With a claimed 50 years of industry experience, the company serves film, broadcast, and media production professionals worldwide, offering a broad portfolio including motion control rigs, broadcast solutions, volumetric capture, and product photography automation. The website reflects a strong market position with professional branding and comprehensive product information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, delivering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security plugins, though explicit security headers and policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrmoco.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and media sectors, targeting professional users in film and broadcast industries. Its business model centers on manufacturing and supplying high-end motion control and broadcast robotics equipment, complemented by rental services and related product lines such as Showbolt and Slidekamera. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a global reach, supported by a strong digital presence and active marketing through social media and analytics platforms. Partnerships with rental and product-specific domains suggest a diversified ecosystem. The company leverages its long-standing industry experience as a competitive advantage, positioning itself as a leader in precision motion control technology.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses security-related plugins to mitigate common threats such as user enumeration. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No published security policy or incident response contacts are found, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file further reduces the security maturity level. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear security policies and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance cookie consent transparency and allow granular user control over tracking preferences.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mark Roberts Motion Control
Description
Mark Roberts Motion Control are world leading specialists in the design and manufacture of motion control camera rigs and heads with 50 years of experience.
Key services
Motion control camera rigs and heads, Broadcast solutions, Volumetric capture, Product photography automation, Robotic arms and camera control, Equipment rentals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, jQuery, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Visitor Queue tracking, Fancybox, Animate.css
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (Stop User Enumeration)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visitor Queue
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Visitor Queue
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Visitor Queue
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active commercial site
  3. Strong branding and professional presentation
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  6. Contact form present but no direct emails or phone numbers visible
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  8. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing popular plugins such as Gravity Forms for contact forms and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates multiple third-party scripts including HubSpot for marketing automation, Visitor Queue for visitor tracking, and Google Tag Manager for analytics management. The site features responsive design with mobile-optimized video backgrounds and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries like Animate.css and Fancybox. Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization. Accessibility features appear adequate, and SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrmoco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrmoco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.