Skip to main content

Security report for morelogin.com

MoreLogin · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MoreLogin operates as a technology company specializing in anti-detection browser software designed to help users manage multiple online accounts anonymously. The company positions itself as a leader in this niche, offering products such as an antidetect browser and cloud phone services. Their business model includes free trials and paid subscriptions, targeting users who require anonymity and multiple account management capabilities. The website is professionally designed, with consistent branding and a clear focus on technology and privacy. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, utilizing Ant Design for UI components, and integrates analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response contacts. The presence of a bug bounty program indicates a proactive security stance. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common and justified in this industry. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with moderate risk due to limited transparency in domain registration data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching morelogin.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MoreLogin targets a specialized market segment focused on online anonymity and multi-account management. Their competitive advantage lies in offering an antidetect browser with cloud phone integration, supported by a bug bounty program and affiliate marketing. The company maintains partnerships with security firms and service providers, enhancing credibility. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and affiliate commissions. The target audience includes digital marketers, social media managers, and users requiring privacy online. Growth indicators include active social media presence and continuous product updates. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving security and proxy providers. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding product offerings and strengthening security and privacy compliance to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness. The bug bounty program is a positive indicator of security culture. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing incident response details, and adding cookie consent.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MoreLogin
Description
MoreLogin anti-detection browser helps you stay anonymous on the Internet and manage thousands of online accounts with profiles in one easy-to-use interface.
Key services
Antidetect Browser, Cloud Phone
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Ant Design, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Google Identity Services
Frameworks
Next.js, Ant Design
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact form
  5. Privacy and terms of service pages are present and comprehensive
  6. No cookie consent banner detected
  7. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Telegram
  8. Bug bounty program indicates proactive security posture
  9. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found
  10. No certifications displayed on site
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with Ant Design as the UI framework. It integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile optimized and has a moderate performance profile. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. No technical debt or legacy technology issues were observed, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with morelogin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review morelogin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.