Skip to main content

Security report for mobileportland.com

YouTube / Google · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed page is a consent management interface hosted on the subdomain consent.youtube.com, which is part of YouTube, owned by Google LLC. The page is designed to manage user consent for cookies and privacy preferences, complying with GDPR and other privacy regulations. It is a minimalistic, functional page that integrates tightly with Google's infrastructure and services. The business behind the page is a global technology leader in online video sharing and advertising, with a strong market position and extensive user base. Technically, the page leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript, Material Design Components, and Google APIs. It is hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and high availability. The page is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS to secure communications. While explicit security headers are not visible in the provided data, Google's standards imply strong security practices. From a security perspective, the page shows no signs of vulnerabilities or blocking by WAFs. The domain is legitimate, being a subdomain of youtube.com, a well-established domain owned by Google. Privacy compliance is indicated by the presence of consent management functionality, although explicit privacy and cookie policies were not found on this specific page. No contact information or incident response details are present. Overall, the page represents a secure, trustworthy, and professionally maintained component of YouTube's privacy compliance framework. It poses minimal risk and aligns with industry best practices for consent management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobileportland.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YouTube, operated by Google LLC, is the world's leading online video sharing platform. Its business model is primarily advertising-driven, offering content hosting and streaming services to a global audience. The platform targets general users, content creators, and advertisers. YouTube's market position is dominant in the digital video space, supported by Google's extensive ecosystem and infrastructure. The consent page analyzed is part of YouTube's compliance with global privacy regulations, reflecting the company's commitment to legal and ethical standards. The platform's revenue streams include advertising, premium subscriptions, and content partnerships. Strategic partnerships and integrations with other Google services enhance its competitive advantage.

Security posture

The security posture of the consent.youtube.com page is strong, leveraging HTTPS and Google's secure hosting environment. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, but Google's infrastructure typically enforces robust security controls including CSP, HSTS, and secure cookie flags. The page does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries. The absence of contact information for incident response or vulnerability disclosure on this page is typical for a consent interface but could be improved by linking to broader Google security resources. Overall, the security maturity is high, with minimal vulnerabilities and good compliance with privacy regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Explicitly include and link to privacy and cookie policies on the consent page for transparency.
  2. Add visible contact information or links for security incident reporting and vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Ensure all recommended security headers (HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, CSP) are explicitly set and documented.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update consent mechanisms to align with evolving privacy laws and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
YouTube / Google
Description
Consent management interface for YouTube, a video sharing platform owned by Google.
Key services
video streaming, content hosting, advertising platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google APIs
Frameworks
Material Design Components
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy (implied by Google standards)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The page is a consent management interface for YouTube, part of Google's ecosystem.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is expected.
  3. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies explicitly found on this page.
  4. The page uses Google-hosted scripts and resources, indicating strong infrastructure.
  5. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  6. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the provided data but HTTPS is enforced.
  8. The page is minimalistic and functional, focused on user consent management.
Technical notes

Notes

The page uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript and Material Design Components, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure. Performance is fast with mobile optimization in place. The page is minimalistic, focusing on consent management functionality. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom-built interface. External resources are loaded from trusted Google domains. The technical implementation is robust, but explicit SEO and accessibility optimizations appear basic. There is opportunity to enhance metadata and structured data for better search engine understanding and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobileportland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobileportland.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.