Skip to main content

Security report for mobalytics.gg

Mobalytics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobalytics is a technology company specializing in gaming performance analytics and companion software, targeting competitive gamers across multiple popular titles such as League of Legends, TFT, Diablo 4, and others. The platform boasts over 10 million users and maintains partnerships with esports organizations, positioning itself as a leading player in the gaming analytics market. Their business model revolves around providing personalized game insights, in-game overlays, and esports data services, primarily delivered via a WordPress-based website and a Windows desktop application integrated through Overwolf. Technically, the website leverages a modern tech stack including WordPress CMS, Google Fonts, multiple analytics and marketing tools (Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Hotjar, Ahrefs, Comscore), and integrates Riot Games APIs for game data. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with fast loading times and clear navigation. Hosting appears to be cloud-based with CDN usage for static assets. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs asynchronous loading of scripts to minimize performance impact. However, explicit security headers are not evident, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are visible, which may impact user trust and support accessibility. Overall, Mobalytics presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. To enhance security posture and compliance, the company should publish clear privacy and security policies, implement security headers, and provide direct contact information. These improvements would further solidify user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobalytics.gg

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobalytics operates in the competitive gaming analytics sector, leveraging data-driven insights to help gamers improve performance. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized recommendations, in-game overlays, and partnerships with major esports entities like T1 Team and Riot Games' LCS Amateur Scene. The business model is SaaS-oriented, monetizing through desktop app downloads and potentially premium features. The target market includes millions of Riot Games players worldwide, with a community spanning 182 countries. Growth indicators include a large user base and active esports collaborations. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with Overwolf and Riot Games, enhancing its market position and service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with asynchronous script loading to reduce risk. However, the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies represents a compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. The cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but the lack of a detailed privacy policy and terms of service reduces GDPR compliance confidence. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear and direct contact information for security incidents and general support inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mobalytics
Description
The all-in-one gaming companion that analyzes your performance and gives you insights to level up your game.
Key services
Game performance analytics, Personalized recommendations, In-game overlays, Esports data and statistics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mixpanel, Ahrefs Analytics, Comscore, Bing Ads, Overwolf (desktop app integration), Riot Games API (rgea.min.js)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, Desktop (Windows app via Overwolf)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Ahrefs Analytics, Comscore, Quantcast, ScorecardResearch, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Comscore, Hotjar, Mixpanel, Ahrefs Analytics, Quantcast, ScorecardResearch
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on gaming analytics and esports partnerships.
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Multiple social media links present for brand engagement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing a modern and diverse technology stack including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mixpanel, Ahrefs Analytics, Comscore, and Bing Ads. It integrates with Overwolf for desktop app distribution and Riot Games APIs for game data. The site uses CDN services for static content delivery, enhancing performance and scalability. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO is well-implemented with comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation to reduce technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobalytics.gg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobalytics.gg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.