Skip to main content

Security report for mobai.bio

Mobai AS · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobai AS is a technology company specializing in biometric identity verification solutions, including face verification, identity proofing, and liveness detection. Their services target banks, identity providers, and regulated industries, offering secure and accessible digital identity solutions. The company leverages academic research and certifications such as NIST testing and Swiss Center for Biometrics certification to establish credibility and market position. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Webflow and integrates advanced SDKs for mobile platforms, ensuring a seamless developer experience and fast performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure forms, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy policies and terms of service are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. WHOIS data is privacy-protected but consistent with a legitimate tech business. Overall, Mobai presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically mature digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobai.bio

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobai operates in the competitive biometric identity verification market, focusing on regulated sectors such as banking and fintech. Their business model includes SaaS offerings with flexible deployment options and developer-friendly APIs and SDKs. The company benefits from strong academic ties and certifications, which differentiate it from competitors. Their target customers are enterprises requiring secure user authentication and compliance with KYC regulations. The presence of a developer portal and podcast indicates active engagement with the developer community and thought leadership. Partnerships with related domains like mobai.dev enhance their ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for secure digital identity solutions in regulated industries.

Security posture

Mobai demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. The company employs biometric encryption and anti-fraud technologies, aligning with industry best practices. Certifications and testing by recognized bodies add to their security credibility. However, the absence of explicit security headers and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Overall, Mobai is well-positioned security-wise but should enhance transparency and technical controls to further strengthen trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy/security contact to comply with GDPR and build user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mobai AS
Description
Mobai is a facial recognition system that works on any device with a camera. The system is tailored to disclose manipulated facial features and protect user data. It integrates into existing systems or runs as a stand-alone application. The company provides advanced identity verification and biometric authentication solutions designed to enhance security and streamline authentication and digital onboarding processes, targeting banks, identity providers, and regulated industries.
Key services
Face verification, Identity proofing, Liveness detection, Customer record verification, Biometric authentication
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, JavaScript, React Native (SDK support), Kotlin (SDK support), Swift (SDK support), Intellimize (A/B testing and personalization)
Frameworks
Webflow, Intellimize
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Intellimize
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intellimize
Marketing tools
Intellimize
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is incomplete and privacy-protected, limiting domain ownership transparency.
  3. Strong focus on biometric identity verification for regulated industries.
  4. Good technical implementation with modern frameworks and mobile SDK support.
  5. Security posture is good but could improve with explicit security headers and published policies.
  6. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; contact primarily via email and contact form.
  8. Social media presence confirmed on LinkedIn.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript and integrates Intellimize for personalization and A/B testing. SDKs support multiple mobile platforms including iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin), and React Native, indicating a robust developer ecosystem. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, contributing to fast load times and good mobile optimization. The site features well-structured metadata and Open Graph tags for SEO and social sharing. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are good, though some enhancements in accessibility features could be considered. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobai.bio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobai.bio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.