Skip to main content

Security report for mmm.page

mmm.page · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

mmm.page is a technology company offering a simple, drag & drop website builder platform that enables users to create unique websites quickly and easily. Positioned as a niche player in the website builder market, it targets general users seeking creative and fun web presence solutions such as portfolios, link-in-bio pages, and landing pages. The platform leverages modern web technologies including React, Firebase, and integrates with payment and analytics services like Stripe and Google Analytics. The website demonstrates good technical maturity with fast performance, mobile optimization, and strong security headers including a strict Content-Security-Policy and HTTPS enforcement. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The security posture is solid with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Overall, the business appears legitimate with consistent WHOIS data and a clear market focus, but should improve privacy compliance and transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmm.page

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mmm.page, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mmm.page right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

mmm.page operates as a SaaS platform in the technology sector, focusing on easy-to-use website creation tools. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, speed, and a unique branding approach that encourages messy, imperfect, and fun websites. Revenue likely comes from premium upgrades for domains, private pages, and unlimited blocks, while the core service remains free. The target audience is broad, including individuals and small creators who want quick web presence without technical complexity. The company maintains an active community via Discord and social media, supporting user engagement and growth. Partnerships with payment processors and analytics providers indicate a mature operational ecosystem. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand compliance documentation and enhance accessibility to capture more enterprise or regulated customers.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy restricting scripts, styles, images, and frames to trusted sources. No insecure or deprecated libraries were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap but does not directly impact technical security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to demonstrate security readiness. Tracking and analytics are implemented responsibly with known providers. Overall, the site is secure for users, but enhancing transparency and formal security policies would strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal clarity.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mmm.page
Description
Websites don't have to be so cookie cutter. Make a website that feels uniquely you in under five minutes.
Key services
Drag & drop website builder, Custom URL creation, Link-in-bio, portfolios, landing pages, moodboards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Firebase (realtime database usage), Stripe (payment processing), Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Gumroad embed, YouTube embeds, Vimeo embeds, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Firebase, Cloudflare
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict CSP with script-src, style-src, img-src restrictions
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No object-src allowed
  • Frame ancestors restricted

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Plausible, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, Plausible, Sentry
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Plausible
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a simple drag & drop website builder targeting general users.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and integrations.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Good security headers and HTTPS usage.
  5. Moderate use of tracking and analytics services.
  6. Clear calls to action for sign up and explore.
  7. Social media and community presence via Discord and Twitter.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a modern single-page application likely using React, supported by Firebase for realtime data and Stripe for payments. It uses a strict Content-Security-Policy and loads assets from multiple trusted CDNs and service providers. Performance is optimized with responsive images and lazy loading. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling. Analytics and error tracking are integrated via Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Plausible, and Sentry. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare or a similar CDN provider. Technical risks are minimal but depend on third-party scripts which should be regularly audited. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie management which is a technical and compliance risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmm.page. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmm.page.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.