Skip to main content

Security report for mira.se

Mira Network · Education · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mira Network is a well-established Swedish company specializing in CRM solutions tailored for commercial and higher education sectors in the Nordic region. Founded in 1998, it serves a significant client base including 14 of the top 20 Nordic higher education institutions. The company offers a comprehensive CRM platform with modules for email marketing, event management, external relations, commercial education, and GDPR compliance. Their market position is strong within their niche, supported by professional branding and a clear focus on education technology. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including various marketing and analytics tools such as Intercom, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. While the site is generally well-optimized for SEO and mobile use, some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and no critical vulnerabilities are evident, but the absence of explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism are notable gaps. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Mira Network presents a credible and professional online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mira.se

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mira Network operates a SaaS business model focused on CRM software for the education sector in the Nordics. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized modules for alumni relations, fundraising, and corporate relations integrated with regional systems like LADOK and Oodi. Revenue streams include subscription plans with tiered pricing and professional services such as configuration and training. The target customers are universities and commercial education providers seeking integrated CRM and marketing solutions. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by client logos and social media presence. Growth indicators include a long operational history and a comprehensive blog with recent posts. Strategic observations suggest potential to expand privacy and security offerings to meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness communication. GDPR compliance is supported through consent logging and data erasure features within the CRM product, but the website itself lacks a cookie consent banner, which is a compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or known exploits are detected in the frontend scripts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for business operations but would benefit from enhanced security headers, incident response disclosures, and cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure compliance with EU cookie laws and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MIRA NETWORK AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mira Network
Description
CRM for commercial and higher education in the Nordics
Key services
Complete CRM functionality, Email marketing, Event management, External relations modules for higher education, Commercial education support, Data protection and GDPR compliance features
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Responsive Lightbox, Colorbox Panels, Download Monitor
Frameworks
The SEO Framework, Heroic Knowledge Base
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent logging for GDPR
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Focus on CRM solutions for Nordic higher education and commercial education sectors
  3. Strong client base with major Nordic universities
  4. Good GDPR compliance features but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No terms of service found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and jQuery, supplemented by multiple plugins for SEO, analytics, and UI enhancements. The tech stack includes modern marketing and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. The site uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for typography and icons. Some technical debt is indicated by the presence of unused or unconfigured plugins (e.g., MonsterInsights without Google Analytics setup). The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and explicit security headers. Hosting provider details are not directly discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be optimized for performance, security, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mira.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mira.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.