Skip to main content

Security report for minor-kontor.de

Minor · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Minor is a German non-profit project consulting and research organization focused on education, social research, and integration projects. The website presents a professional and well-structured portfolio of projects related to migration, democracy, and work. The organization targets societal groups, researchers, and NGOs with services including research, program consulting, further education, and networking. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and plugins, including GDPR-compliant cookie management and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for security. The security posture is good with HTTPS and consent mechanisms but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching minor-kontor.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention minor-kontor.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
91
Employees
10
Customers
16
Third parties
65
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for minor-kontor.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –vtiger7.minor-kontor.de2026-06-13
  • –pass.minor-kontor.de2026-06-13
  • –analytics.minor-kontor.de2026-06-10
  • –wordpress.minor-kontor.de2026-06-06
  • –neu.minor-kontor.de2026-06-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Minor operates in the education and non-profit sectors with a niche focus on marginalized groups and integration. Their business model revolves around project consulting, research, and educational services. The website indicates a stable market position with a clear project portfolio and partnerships such as minor-wissenschaft.de. The target audience includes academic, governmental, and social organizations. The organization appears small but established, with consistent branding and good content quality. No direct revenue streams are visible, consistent with a non-profit model. The partnership ecosystem is modest but relevant to their mission.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via the Complianz GDPR plugin with opt-in mechanisms, indicating good privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good for a small non-profit organization.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Minor
Description
Minor – Projektkontor für Bildung und Forschung wird von einem interdisziplinären und interkulturellen Team getragen. Vielfältig, engagiert und wissenschaftlich fundiert arbeiten wir mit und für gesellschaftlich marginalisierte Gruppen. Wir sind bundesweit und transnational aktiv in der Forschung, Programm- und Projektberatung, Weiterbildung, Netzwerkarbeit und Modellprojektentwicklung.
Key services
Research, Program and project consulting, Further education, Networking, Model project development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP, jQuery 3.4.1, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Plausible Analytics, Bootstrap, GSAP, ScrollMagic, WPBakery Page Builder, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and focused on education, research, and social projects.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. Contact information includes email and phone in footer and contact page.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented; missing some security headers.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a child theme of Kalium and uses WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It leverages jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap CSS framework, and animation libraries like GSAP and ScrollMagic. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is integrated for bot protection. Analytics are handled by Google Analytics and Plausible Analytics, with GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Complianz plugin. Hosting is via kasserver.com as indicated by nameservers. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with multiple font preloads and lazy loading images. Some technical debt may exist due to multiple plugins and scripts but overall infrastructure is stable and modern.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with minor-kontor.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review minor-kontor.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.