Skip to main content

Security report for minimalizacesikany.cz

Minimalizace šikany · Education · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Minimalizace šikany is an educational program website focused on helping schools reduce the frequency and severity of bullying incidents. The site targets schools and educational institutions primarily in the Czech Republic. The business model appears to be service-oriented, providing programs and support for bullying prevention. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme and includes SEO optimizations but lacks configured analytics and privacy compliance features. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness but could improve accessibility and security headers. Security posture is basic with no evident vulnerabilities but lacks important security headers and privacy policies. Overall, the risk is moderate due to missing WHOIS data and privacy compliance gaps. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, configuring analytics properly, improving security headers, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching minimalizacesikany.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a specialized educational program provider in the Czech market, focusing on bullying minimization in schools. It likely operates as a small entity with a niche target audience of educational institutions. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits transparency. The site does not show evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model is service-based, possibly funded by schools or educational grants. Growth indicators and market position are not explicitly stated. The website branding is consistent and professional, supporting credibility within its niche.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Incident response and security policies are not published, reducing transparency. The site does not appear to have a dedicated security contact or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small educational site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance security posture.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove unused analytics plugins to avoid data collection issues.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Minimalizace šikany
Description
Minimalizace šikany je program, který pomáhá školám snižovat četnost i závažnost projevů šikanování.
Key services
program to reduce bullying frequency and severity in schools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi theme, All in One SEO plugin, Google Fonts, jQuery (custom implementation)
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain may not be registered properly.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and SEO plugin.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  6. No security policies or incident response information available.
  7. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured.
  8. Content is educational and safe for general audiences.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Technical implementation is standard but could improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. SEO is enhanced via the All in One SEO plugin, and Google Analytics is integrated via MonsterInsights but not configured. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information was detected. The technical setup is typical for small to medium WordPress sites but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with minimalizacesikany.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review minimalizacesikany.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.