Skip to main content

Security report for miladymaker.net

Remilia Collective · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Milady Maker is a niche NFT generative art project launched in 2021 by Remilia Collective, featuring a collection of 10,000 neochibi-style profile picture NFTs inspired by Japanese street fashion tribes. The project emphasizes community engagement through events such as virtual raves, Minecraft metaverse integration, and derivative expansions. The business model relies on NFT sales, secondary market trading, merchandise, and community-driven content. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with use of React, Web3.js, and integration with blockchain platforms. However, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protections but could be improved by adding security headers and DNSSEC.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miladymaker.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Milady Maker occupies a unique position in the NFT and digital art market, leveraging a strong cultural aesthetic and copyleft licensing to foster a vibrant ecosystem of derivative works and community projects. Its competitive advantage lies in its distinctive art style, active community, and multi-platform presence including social media, Discord, and blockchain marketplaces. Revenue streams include primary NFT sales, secondary market royalties, merchandise sales, and event participation. The target audience includes NFT collectors, digital art enthusiasts, and fans of Japanese street fashion culture. Partnerships with platforms like OpenSea and Hologram Labs enhance its ecosystem. The project is relatively young but shows signs of steady growth and community engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and benefits from domain status protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and DNSSEC, which are important for compliance and defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of contact information reduces the ability to report security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Remilia Collective
Description
Milady Maker is a collection of 10,000 generative pfpNFT's in a neochibi aesthetic inspired by street style tribes.
Key services
NFT generative art collection, Community events (raves, VRtube avatars, Minecraft metaverse), Derivative expansions and companion collections, Merchandise sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React 17.0.2, Web3.js, BigNumber.js
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Dune Analytics (dashboard link)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Twitter, Discord
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche NFT generative art project with strong community focus.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Web3 integration.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Multiple external links to social media and partner platforms.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including React 17 and Web3.js for blockchain interaction, indicating a contemporary technical approach. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS, and the domain is registered via Squarespace Domains. Performance is moderate with audio and embedded video content, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, accessibility features are basic and no structured data (JSON-LD) was detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miladymaker.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miladymaker.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.