Skip to main content

Security report for mikroshema.lv

SIA Mikroshēma · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mikroshema.lv is a small local Latvian business specializing in computer repair and servicing, primarily serving the Iļģuciems area. The website provides basic information about the company’s services and contact phone number but lacks comprehensive business details such as email contacts or privacy policies. The business appears to be a traditional local service provider with a focus on fast and reliable computer repair. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries and basic HTML/CSS with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Google Analytics is implemented for visitor tracking, but no privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, indicating limited GDPR compliance. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation and missing security headers, and no WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for significant improvements in security, privacy, and content richness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikroshema.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a small-sized local computer repair service provider. Its market position is focused on the local Latvian community, particularly in Iļģuciems and nearby neighborhoods. The business model is straightforward, offering repair and maintenance services with an emphasis on quick turnaround. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. Revenue streams likely come from direct service fees. The website’s minimal content and lack of digital marketing tools suggest a low level of digital maturity and limited online customer engagement. No certifications or trust badges are displayed, which could be a growth opportunity. The absence of social media presence or email contacts limits customer outreach and support capabilities.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers exposes the site to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.8.3) may introduce vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of contact forms reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to protect user data and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance notices and consent mechanisms.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries and other dependencies to current secure versions.
  4. Introduce secure contact forms with input validation to facilitate user communication.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against common attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Mikroshēma
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Mikroshēma
Description
Mikroshēma provides computer repair and servicing in Iļģuciems, Dzirciema iela 67, with fast service.
Key services
Computer repair, Computer servicing, Fast technical support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, jQuery UI 1.9.2, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Only one phone number found in meta description, no email or contact form present.
  4. No social media links or email addresses found.
  5. Uses outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) which may pose security risks.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  7. Website content is minimal and focused on local computer repair services.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. No SSL/TLS configuration details available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery 1.8.3 and jQuery UI 1.9.2, which are outdated and may pose security risks. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible privacy disclosures. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site has basic SEO meta tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or mobile responsiveness beyond basic CSS. Accessibility features are minimal. The hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikroshema.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikroshema.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.