Skip to main content

Security report for mi.ee

Visionest Institute · Education · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visionest Institute is an Estonian-based education and training organization formed by the merger of Marketingi Instituut, Invicta, and Director. The company offers a wide range of training courses and development programs targeting both businesses and individual learners, positioning itself as a key player in the Estonian professional education market. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with integrations including WooCommerce, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a modern marketing and analytics setup. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a legitimate and consistent registration. Overall, the website demonstrates good compliance with privacy regulations and provides clear business information, supporting a trustworthy online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mi.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector, focusing on professional development and training services. Its business model includes offering scheduled courses, personalized development plans, and digital content such as a digital magazine and webinars. The target audience includes companies and individual professionals seeking skill enhancement. The website links to partner projects and platforms, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The domain age and registrant information support the legitimacy of the business. Marketing and analytics tools are leveraged for customer engagement and performance tracking. The company appears medium-sized with a growing market presence in Estonia.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visionest Institute
Description
Marketingi Instituut, Invicta ja Director on ühinenud, oleme nüüd Visionest Institute. Ettevõte pakub erinevaid koolitusi ja arenguprogramme, nii ettevõtetele kui individuaalsetele õppijatele.
Key services
Koolitused, Arenguprogrammid, Digiajakiri, Veebiseminarid
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, WP Rocket, Yoast SEO, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on education and training services
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses modern marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. Performance optimizations are in place via WP Rocket plugin, including lazy loading of images and scripts. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO plugin. The hosting provider is not explicitly stated but DNS servers indicate Estonian hosting providers. The technical implementation is solid with good performance and modern standards, though some accessibility features could be improved. The site uses jQuery and standard web fonts from Google Fonts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mi.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mi.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.